Capitalism Rules, Socialism and Communism Suck Thread

[Jack Sawyer]

I told you I'm not playing that game. Slurs are not arguments

So nowadays, to apparent conservatives and possibly triggered snowflakes, calling a climate change denier a climate change denier is a slur somehow.

Excellent argument.

[TheSpoonald]

So nowadays, to apparent conservatives and possibly triggered snowflakes, calling a climate change denier a climate change denier is a slur somehow.

Excellent argument.

It is a slur.

First. It's inaccurate. I don't deny that climate changes. However, I do deny that it's a problem. I deny that there is definitive proof that humans are the cause. I deny that the consequences are catastrophic. I deny any statement that says "X is going to happen in Y years". And I deny the idea that the only way to fix the problem is a massive central government and planned economy.

I mean, this whole climate change agenda would be a little easier to swallow if it didn't coincedentally check off all the boxes on the democrat wishlist.

I also deny that those measures on the democrat wishlist would even work. America isn't the only country on earth, and we're far from the most egregious polluter. And if you're about to say "something something paris agreement something something", make sure you also mention how that retarded document allows China to increase it's carbon output.

[TheSpoonald]

We've been threatened with the 10 year countdown over and over and over again.

Serious question: How many times does it have to be wrong before I'm allowed to be skeptical? How many times does this have to prove out to be total bullshit before "denial" is justified?

Serious question. How many? I'd like an answer please. Hint: It's a positive integer >0

How many times do I have to be right before I stop being crazy?

[Jack Sawyer]

Quick recap, for the context

Posts Steven Crowder vid, brandishing his opinion on Climate Change as if it were fact, in typical Crowder fashion

Steven Crowder?

Not playing that game. If you have a problem with what he says, make your case.

If your argument amounts to "ZOMG, *THAT'S* YOUR SOURCE!!" then please eat a pine cone and enjoy the rest of your day.

But *THAT'S* YOUR SOURCE!! ZOMG

I really wonder about what Steven Crowder thinks about climate change

Steve was just telling you what I think about climate change. Better you hear it from him cuz he did all the research and shit. I just kinda smelled bullshit and went with my gut.

Too bad you chose to have the same opinions as a walking talking confirmation bias

I told you I'm not playing that game. Slurs are not arguments

So nowadays, to apparent conservatives and possibly triggered snowflakes, calling a climate change denier a climate change denier is a slur somehow.

Excellent argument.

I knew I've seen that tactic before somewhere ...

Oh, that's right;



Congrats banana, you just perfectly emulated your idol Tucker.

[TheSpoonald]

I knew I've seen that tactic before somewhere ...

It's funny you mention "context" in the opening of your post. It's funny because your buddies at TYT totally ignored it.

Did you see the 5 minutes of Tucker's show before that segment?

Do you know what Joy Behar said on the view that day?

And this guy's screaming about Dylan Roof???!!!! Here's a life-tip. When someone says "we currently have people like _______" and then names someone who's been in prison for half a decade....he's full of shit.

[OngBonga]

Right. Exactly. As you can see from this chart, after they built the wall in Hungary, they had so many illegal crossings that it made them far too busy to fill in the chart.

There's a bit of a difference here though. All the wall in Hungary had to do was make it more difficult than going another route. Nobody actually wanted to go to Hungary, it was just the easiest route to places like Germany. Now it isn't the easiest route. So in that regard, the wall is a success.