|
|
 Originally Posted by oskar
If you don't think that russia interfered in the 2016 election because it doesn't meet your standards of proof,
I didn't say this. I asked you to define "interfered"
but you think that Clinton (I don't know which one) is a rapist..
Juanita Broderick has a credible story, and no reason to lie. I'm not saying that Clinton should be charged with anything. I probably only brought this up to point out the hypocrisy being demonstrated by people who don't even know Broderick's name, but think that saying "grab her by the pussy" is a confession of sexual assault.
You can't at the same time have insane standards of proof against your position but then hop on every kind of conspiracy theory against who you perceive as the other side
Citation please? This is extremely vague.
Same with language. Trump can say whatever he wants and you'll defend it
Provably false
but if Obama and Clinton say "easter worshippers," that is somehow signs of a grand conspiracy and a very bad thing.
Dude...come back to the real world. If you think that that political operatives don't work to distribute talking points to prominent democrats in order to homogenize the message and promote party unity....you're living in outer space. The RNC does the same thing. And it's actually not a very bad thing. Just acknowledge that it happens ok? No one is asking you to wear a foil hat.
But....to use MMM's phrasing.....I think it's "interesting" that the coordinate effort (which most definitely does exist) chose to exclude the word "Christian" or "catholic" and replace it with "Easter Worshipers". That's actually really fucking weird.
Do you really think you're being consistent here?
I'll consider that question if you can show an inconsistency. So far, they only exist in your imagination.
|
Reply With Quote
