|
|
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
Some people want something else. Some people want to see factual news reporting, responsible analysis, and compelling commentary.
...so they tune into Fox News?
Seriously, some if not most people want to feed their confirmation bias. And whatever channel they choose to watch mostly shows where on the political spectrum they started from, not where they end up.
Originally Posted by BananaStand
My position is that discourse is good. Is that not worthy of glorification?
TC does not do "discourse." He invites guests on and doesn't listen to them but just looks at them confusedly before cutting them off.
Originally Posted by BananaStand
The opposition says "you can't say that, it's offensive". Should that not be villified?
When you can show TC actually doing something approaching honest discourse, you can come back with that argument.
What the opposition should be vilified for is going waaaay overboard with the outrage, just like your side routinely does.
Originally Posted by BananaStand
One side says "yes let's talk",
That's not what he's saying. He's not inviting anyone to have a fair conversation. That's not his thing.
Originally Posted by BananaStand
the other side says "no, that's racist". They can't BOTH be total idiots!!!!
Actually, they can and they are. Repeatedly. As are you for trying to make TC out to be this innocent bystander who is objectively seeking the truth rather than trying to push an agenda.
Originally Posted by BananaStand
...
I take it the rest is the same repitition of the same argument that TC is some kind of grand thinker and not just a mouthpiece for the right. If you're not even willing to accept that the latter is a better representation of what he is, then there's no point.
Mojo and I have both pointed out that your outrage is tedious and boring and pointless.
Keep raging on though cause it's obviously giving you a reason to get up in the morning.
|
Reply With Quote