Trump is the WWE and Mueller is The Undertaker

[Poopadoop]

The fact remains, he'd have to be unbelievably stupid to pilfer a chairty when he's a billionaire.

So if it turns out he pilfered a charity you would conclude he's unbelievably stupid?

Glad we got that on record.

[Poopadoop]

What's the worst penalty a civil court can impose?

Spoiler: Show

I hope your head just exploded.

Given the violations alleged in the civil case, some experts believe a tax investigation could lead to state criminal charges filed against President Trump

Spoiler: Show

It didn't.

[Poopadoop]

Lol claims of 16 different violations by Trump Foundation. But obviously he's irrevocably innocent 'cause it hasn't gone to trial yet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald...ump_Foundation

Nothing to see here folks. Moving on.

[BananaStand]

I thought going bankrupt is the very definition of fucking up. Particularly when you mention businesses/businessmen/women. He did so, 6 times.

He's opened more than 500 companies!!! 6 bankruptcies means the guy is a fuck-up?

Did you have enough IQs for breakfast this morning?

[BananaStand]

"some experts believe....."

*yawn*

oh, and the President can't be charged with a crime. You keep forgetting that

[OngBonga]

In the sense of being born to a wealthy dad, yes he did. Dude was born on third base and claims to have hit a triple. Yeah, baseball analogies, must be high level calculus to Brits

Didn't Daddy give him a million? Pretty easy to blow that. Much harder to turn it into a billion.

I thought going bankrupt is the very definition of fucking up.

I think we both know that there's a lot more than two sides to the bankruptcy coin.

Trump’s companies have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, which means a company can remain in business while wiping away many of its debts.

This quote gives quite an insight. I mean, let's start with the distinction between "Trump" and "Trump's companies". Has Trump ever personally been declared bankrupt? Also, note that it's Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Can continue trading, debts wiped. Sounds like a sweet deal to me. I'm sure there are many instances where it would be economically advantageous to declare C11 bankruptcy. How is that failure?

[Poopadoop]

Some of this stuff is actually pretty hilarious.

In an exhibit attached to the filing, Trump Foundation treasurer Allen Weisselberg claimed he hadn't been aware that he treasurer or on the board of the foundation until he was approached by investigators.

Trump distributed at least some of the funds publicly at "Donald Trump for President" political rallies, displaying large-size donation checks that included his campaign slogan "Make America Great Again" or a link to a campaign website.

In each of 1995 and 1999, the Trump Foundation granted $50,000 to the National Museum of Catholic Art and Library. A 2001 report by The Village Voice stated, after visiting the museum in East Harlem, that the facility had "next to no art" and no official connection to the Catholic church, despite having had a 10-year track record of soliciting large-scale donations for its collection. The Voice and, later, The Washington Post, concluded that Trump may have directed the grants to the museum to curry favor with the museum's then chairman, Eddie Malloy, who was also head of the Building and Construction Trades Council of Greater New York. The Council had worked on behalf of one of the unions of workers who worked on Trump construction projects.

In 2007, Trump used Trump Foundation funds to settle a 2006 legal dispute between the Town of Palm Beach, Florida, and Trump's Mar-a-Lago country club.

Trump's foundation paid $158,000 to the Martin B. Greenberg Foundation as a settlement of a lawsuit brought by Greenberg against the Trump National Golf Club Westchester in Briarcliff Manor, New York.

According to the Trump Foundation's publicly available tax returns, Trump National Golf Club Westchester paid over $200,000 to the Trump Foundation in 2016, with $158,000 of the funds designated as repayment of the foundation funds used toward the Martin B . Greenberg settlement

In 2013, the Trump Foundation donated $25,000 in support of Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi's election campaign while Bondi's office was reviewing fraud allegations against Trump University, a for-profit real estate program created by Donald Trump

Trump may have strategically directed money from the Trump Foundation to support his presidential campaign.[80] In one case, the grants were used specifically to pay for newspaper ads.

In November 2007, Trump spent $10,000 in Trump Foundation funds to purchase a 6 feet (1.8 m)-tall portrait of himself by artist Michael Israel at a benefit for a Florida charity

In 2014, at a charity for the Unicorn Children's Foundation, held at his Mar-a-Lago resort, Trump purchased a 4 feet (1.2 m)-tall painting of a 1990s version of himself by Argentine artist Havi Schanz, paying for it with $20,000 of Trump Foundation funds.

In 2012, Trump bid $12,000 at a charity auction, hosted at his Mar-a-lago club, to purchase an NFL football helmet autographed by Tim Tebow and a Tebow football jersey. Trump was given credit for generosity in newspaper accounts.[89] However, the purchase was made with $12,000 of foundation money, not his own

In 2008 Trump used $107,000 of Trump Foundation funds to purchase a luxury trip to Paris, including a meeting with actress Salma Hayek, at a charity auction for the Gucci Foundation

Trump may have directed income owed to him personally to be sent to the foundation instead, in possible violation of tax rules. The Washington Post reported in September 2016 that Donald Trump had directed that $2.3 million owed to him and his organization by various people and organizations should be paid instead to his foundation as donations, possibly evading personal income taxes

Geez, I'm only halfway down the page.

Ya, they got nothing on him. Guy's totally legit.

[OngBonga]

So if it turns out he pilfered a charity you would conclude he's unbelievably stupid?

Sure. Despite what you might think about anyone who ever says anything in his defence, I don't have a raging hard on for Trump. If he's doing a Clinton Foundation, then he's a cunt.

[Poopadoop]

"some experts believe....."

Not as authoratitive a source as Fox News, I'll admit.

the President can't be charged with a crime. You keep forgetting that

You might want to revise that opinion. Save yourself the demagogic cognitive dissonance you seem to suffer from.

http://time.com/5123598/president-tr...-constitution/

[OngBonga]

The President can't be charged with a crime? Is this a technical point? He first gets impeached, and then an ex-President gets charged with a crime?

Can Trump be charged for an alleged crime committed while in office? I would hope so.

[Poopadoop]

I kinda suspect Trump ran for president as a publicity stunt and nothing more. I mean, if you're really up to your neck is this much greasy stuff, it makes no sense at all to expose yourself to the amount of public scrutiny a sitting president will get.

Either that, or he really just is that fucking stupid, and thought he could get away with it.

Really, I'm torn on which it is.

[BananaStand]

So some of those allege that he spend charitable funds on charity. You know that's not a crime right?

And the last one is kind of odd. Your beef is that he put too much money into the charity?

[Poopadoop]

The President can't be charged with a crime? Is this a technical point? He first gets impeached, and then an ex-President gets charged with a crime?

Can Trump be charged for an alleged crime committed while in office? I would hope so.

Not according to Fox News. He could literally shoot Melania through the ear in front of the entire world and they'd have to first start impeachment proceedings, go through that, then move onto the Senate, vote, etc.. And while all this is going on he's still president. Only after they impeach and depose him do they take the keys to the WH away and then try him in court.

[OngBonga]

I kinda suspect Trump ran for president as a publicity stunt and nothing more. I mean, if you're really up to your neck is this much greasy stuff, it makes no sense at all to expose yourself to the amount of public scrutiny a sitting president will get.

Either that, or he really just is that fucking stupid, and thought he could get away with it.

Really, I'm torn on which it is.

I mean there is a third option, and one you should at least consider, assuming you're a man of reason.

He is not guilty of any crime, and is the subject of a relentless witch hunt, on a scale we haven't seen before.

[Poopadoop]

So some of those allege that he spend charitable funds on charity. You know that's not a crime right?

And the last one is kind of odd. Your beef is that he put too much money into the charity?

You can't give the money to a charity if it's going to benefit you personally. That's not what a charity is for.

And no, it doesn't matter if the other "charity" is as dodgy and corrupt as your "charity".

[BananaStand]

The President can't be charged with a crime? Is this a technical point? He first gets impeached, and then an ex-President gets charged with a crime?

Can Trump be charged for an alleged crime committed while in office? I would hope so.

No. A sitting president can NOT be charged with a crime. There is some dispute on this among so-called "legal experts". But the vast consensus is that "no" a sitting president can not be charged with a crime.

That's because when you're in America, and not in some psycho socialist shithole, you are entitled to the presumption of innocence. Being charged with a crime doesn't mean you're guilty of the crime. You need to be proven guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, in a court of law and be judged guilty by a jury of your peers. Until that happens, you're just charged. That's it.

So someone who is merely charged with a crime, and not convicted of one, should not yet incur any consequences or punishments for the alleged crime. How do you punish someone who is currently presumed innocent? So the mere charge of a crime would not be enough to unseat a president from office.

However, defending oneself against such a charge would put undue stress and constraints on the president's time, and interfere with his ability to do his job. That's bad for the country. Everyone agrees on that no matter which side you're on.

And for those reasons, you can't charge a sitting president with a crime.

And because of that, the process of impeachment was created and built into the constitution. If the president could be simply charged with a crime....why have such a thing as impeachment at all?

[Poopadoop]

I mean there is a third option, and one you should at least consider, assuming you're a man of reason.

He is not guilty of any crime, and is the subject of a relentless witch hunt, on a scale we haven't seen before.

I'm happy to consider it, I just don't find it very plausible given what I know.

So all of those accusations against his charity, of which I just listed some, are just made up by various people in support of the "witch hunt?" Same with Trump U? Same with all the women accusing him of sexual assault? Same with the Access Hollywood 'pussy grab' tape? This is all a giant, coordinated sham?

Occam's razor.

[BananaStand]

Not according to Fox News. He could literally shoot Melania through the ear in front of the entire world and they'd have to first start impeachment proceedings, go through that, then move onto the Senate, vote, etc.. And while all this is going on he's still president. Only after they impeach and depose him do they take the keys to the WH away and then try him in court.

All true.

However, I do believe there are more expedient remedies built into the constitution for when the president goes full-on nutso. They can relieve him of duty in ways where he is still technically the president, but nothing he says matters, and then Pence calls the shots

[OngBonga]

And because of that, the process of impeachment was created and built into the constitution. If the president could be simply charged with a crime....why have such a thing as impeachment at all?

I figured impeachment can be a moral issue, not just a legal one. For example, lying about blow jobs. Did Bill commit a crime when he lied about that?

[OngBonga]

So all of those accusations against his charity, of which I just listed some, are just made up by various people in support of the "witch hunt?" Same with Trump U? Same with all the women accusing him of sexual assault? Same with the Access Hollywood 'pussy grab' tape? This is all a giant, coordinated sham?

Given the media and political campaign against him, this is all enitrely plausible. In fact, I'd go as far as saying probable. People will do anything for money, and there are some very rich people who oppose Trump.

[BananaStand]

I figured impeachment can be a moral issue, not just a legal one. For example, lying about blow jobs. Did Bill commit a crime when he lied about that?

Yeah. He was under oath. Lying under oath is called perjury. YOu can get years in jail for it.

Notice Bill Clinton was never charged criminally....

and yeah, impeachment can be a moral issue. Like if he goes on TV and says "I just don't give a shit about black people" they'll take him out.

[Poopadoop]

No. A sitting president can NOT be charged with a crime. There is some dispute on this among so-called "legal experts". But the vast consensus is that "no" a sitting president can not be charged with a crime.

That's because when you're in America, and not in some psycho socialist shithole, you are entitled to the presumption of innocence. Being charged with a crime doesn't mean you're guilty of the crime. You need to be proven guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, in a court of law and be judged guilty by a jury of your peers. Until that happens, you're just charged. That's it.

So someone who is merely charged with a crime, and not convicted of one, should not yet incur any consequences or punishments for the alleged crime. How do you punish someone who is currently presumed innocent? So the mere charge of a crime would not be enough to unseat a president from office.

However, defending oneself against such a charge would put undue stress and constraints on the president's time, and interfere with his ability to do his job. That's bad for the country. Everyone agrees on that no matter which side you're on.

And for those reasons, you can't charge a sitting president with a crime.

And because of that, the process of impeachment was created and built into the constitution. If the president could be simply charged with a crime....why have such a thing as impeachment at all?

While it may not be ideal to charge a sitting president with a criminal charge, there's nothing in the constitution that actually bars it. Read the link I posted and try to learn something for a change rather than just popping off the same nonsense over and over.

[Poopadoop]

there are some very rich people who oppose Trump.

Your argument just fell to pieces right there. Why would any very rich person oppose Trump? He's a perfect example of a president that is making rich people richer - tax cuts, regulation cuts. Fuck me.

[OngBonga]

Yeah. He was under oath. Lying under oath is called perjury. YOu can get years in jail for it.

Notice Bill Clinton was never charged criminally....

Yeah I know what perjury is, ask Lord Archer about that one. He went to jail. I just wasn't sure if he lied under oath. So that's what impeachment is... the means by which to remove from office a President accused of a crime, thus clearing the path for formal charges to be brought?

[OngBonga]

Your argument just fell to pieces right there. Why would any very rich person oppose Trump? He's a perfect example of a president that is making rich people richer - tax cuts, regulation cuts. Fuck me.

Are you really this naive?

[Poopadoop]

Yeah. He was under oath. Lying under oath is called perjury. YOu can get years in jail for it.

Notice Bill Clinton was never charged criminally....

Therefore he was never guilty of perjury lol.

Fuck your logic is so retarded.

and yeah, impeachment can be a moral issue.

In theory, but it's never happened.

Like if he goes on TV and says "I just don't give a shit about black people" they'll take him out.

But if he says as much with his actions, it's ok.

[Poopadoop]

Are you really this naive?

Is that supposed to challenge my point?

[Poopadoop]

Yeah I know what perjury is, ask Lord Archer about that one.

I guarantee you he has no idea who Lord Archer is, and doesn't care because it didn't happen in America.

[BananaStand]

Therefore he was never guilty of perjury lol.

True

[OngBonga]

Is that supposed to challenge my point?

Are you saying that all wealthy Americans voted for Trump?

[OngBonga]

I guarantee you he has no idea who Lord Archer is, and doesn't care because it didn't happen in America.

And that would be fair enough, I mean I'm having to ask him to clarify impeachment, which to him is probably like teaching someone how to spell.

[Poopadoop]

Are you saying that all wealthy Americans voted for Trump?

Are you saying they all voted against him?

Do you have an actual point?

[Poopadoop]

And that would be fair enough, I mean I'm having to ask him to clarify impeachment, which to him is probably like teaching someone how to spell.

You could just use google. It's not really that complicated.

[BananaStand]

I guarantee you he has no idea who Lord Archer is, and doesn't care because it didn't happen in America.

Honestly, there was a time I might challenge that, but it's probably true. I really am a stereotypical ass-hole American.

I let my passport expire because I vowed to never leave this great land. Now my company wants me to go to Canada for two days next month. I applied for a new passport, and I just got it. I was bummed. I was hoping that Trump would fire the whole state department and my application would get lost or something.

But I'm finding I'm having some real anxiety about leaving America. I think the US is fucking awesome and everyone where else SUCKS. Like I'm genuinely worried if foreign bridges are sturdy, if their water is clean, if their cops know what the fuck they're doing, etc.

[OngBonga]

Are you saying they all voted against him?

No. You said this...

Why would any very rich person oppose Trump?

All I did was suggest that is naive, and you're taking that as "rich people voted against him"?

There are some very welathy individuals who oppose Trump. Soros is one name I can pull out of my arse. Murdoch is another. How you feeling in that kind of company?

[BananaStand]

Oprah probably voted for Hillary

[Poopadoop]

Like I'm genuinely worried if foreign bridges are sturdy, if their water is clean, if their cops know what the fuck they're doing, etc.

Haven't you seen South Park? Canada is a shithole country. There's no doot aboot it eh?

Take your own water, cause most water comes out of fetid ponds and contains moose shit.

Bridges fall down all the time. Avoid them at all costs.

You have to leave your gun in America, so you can't shoot someone for taking your parking spot.

The roads are really fucked up. The signs use kilometers instead of miles. It's like, totally confusing.

People (even the cops) are way too polite. They use words like 'please' and 'thank you'. It will really make you uncomfortable.

Most people don't have a natural speaking voice above 100 decibels. So you might get some funny looks when you go to a store to buy a soda. They'll wonder why this strange person is shouting at the cashier.

[Poopadoop]

No. You said this...



All I did was suggest that is naive, and you're taking that as "rich people voted against him"?

There are some very welathy individuals who oppose Trump. Soros is one name I can pull out of my arse. Murdoch is another. How you feeling in that kind of company?

Oh, there's two of them at least who didn't like him. Sorry I stand corrected.

I guarantee you most rich people care more about money than anything else. So if a guy gets in office and is good for their bank account, tax cuts and shit, they're right with him.

[oskar]

I want an 'Ask wuf a qanon question' thread.

[BananaStand]

Haven't you seen South Park? Canada is a shithole country. There's no doot aboot it eh?

I'm honestly worried I might have a heart attack just looking at some poutein

[Poopadoop]

I think Ong will be joining this group soon if he's not already in it.

[Poopadoop]

I'm honestly worried I might have a heart attack just looking at some poutein

That shit is fucking gross. I've never tried it and I very much doubt I ever will. Maybe on my deathbed when I just want to get it over and done with.

[Poopadoop]

I want an 'Ask wuf a qanon question' thread.

Oh shit this involves baby rapist traffickers too. Better let Savy know about it.

Edit: just finished the whole thing. This is fucking hilarious. Best part is how they all disagree on the various strands of the conspiracy.

[Savy]

Oh shit this involves baby rapist traffickers too. Better let Savy know about it.

Edit: just finished the whole thing. This is fucking hilarious. Best part is how they all disagree on the various strands of the conspiracy.

Sorry, care to explain?

[Poopadoop]

Sorry, care to explain?

Aren't you on record as saying all powerful people are pedo baby rapists? Or maybe i'm jumbling up you and Ong's separate paranoid theories.

[oskar]

No, Ong is concerned about baby rapists, but not afraid! He's very clear about that. But only naturalized muslim baby rapists from pakistan. Which may or may not disguise themselves as mexican immigrants. Any big government trump-is-a-secret-genius deep state lizard people shit, is probably wuf.
If someone assigns bad hand ranges, that's probably Savy... if Spoon isn't around.

[BananaStand]

Right, the only legitimate conspiracy theories are the ones where Trump rigged the election with the help of foreign hackers, and that he coordinated the firing of James Comey to cover his tracks.

[Savy]

Aren't you on record as saying all powerful people are pedo baby rapists? Or maybe i'm jumbling up you and Ong's separate paranoid theories.

My JOKE was actually that everyoen is a peadophile just only those with enough power think they can get away with it. I don't really think all rich people are doing this shit.

I wish I liked Jim Jefferies but he's just such a bore. Literally only famous as someone beat him up in the early days of people being able to record video on their phone.

[Savy]

If someone assigns bad hand ranges, that's probably Savy... if Spoon isn't around.

Still not busto but I also haven't played poker for a while, wow >

I'm actually tempted to just deposit a couple of hundred quid and start grinding 10nlz and subscribing to upswing. I just need to get myself in a good study group and I'd be golden.

[BananaStand]

I just need to get myself in a good study group and I'd be golden.

I know a guy who makes 20BB's/hour in a live game. He think you're a fucking tool though.

[Poopadoop]

My JOKE was actually that everyoen is a peadophile just only those with enough power think they can get away with it. I don't really think all rich people are doing this shit.

Oh ok so it's just Wuf and Ong that are paranoid. Two out of six ain't bad.

Wait, 2 x 6 = 12, and 12 + 1+2 =15, and add 2 to that and you get 17. I'm starting to see a pattern here.

[OngBonga]

poop really thinks rich people only care about tax policies.

and oskar really thinks what he just said.

and banana really makes 20bb an hour. For now.

[Savy]

I know a guy who makes 20BB's/hour in a live game. He think you're a fucking tool though.

Want to play heads up poker on a site we can both use? I mean I can probably only wager a few grand of my own money which wouldn't be worth your time but I'm sure I could get backing.

In fact we can just use playmoney so we aren't paying rake. The money can just be transfered after we have a winner.

edit - also 20bb/hour is much less than your actual winrate pal don't put yourself down.

[BananaStand]

edit - also 20bb/hour is much less than your actual winrate pal don't put yourself down.

It's true, the best data available has me at 143/BB an hour. I just didn't want to crush your motivation

[BananaStand]

Want to play heads up poker on a site we can both use? .

Yup

[OngBonga]

HU 4 STAX

I HAVE A TEN INCH DICK

MY WIFE IS A SUPERMODEL

MY FERRARI IS IN THE GARAGE

I HAVE AN IQ OF 175

[BananaStand]

HU 4 STAX

No....HU 4 ROLLZ!!

I HAVE A TEN INCH DICK

Time-out. Serious question: Do brits express dick-size in inches?

BTW, my dick is 0.4 meters

MY WIFE IS A SUPERMODEL

Mine isn't. But I fuck six supermodels on the side. On the seventh day, I rest.

MY FERRARI IS IN THE GARAGE

You must be compensating for your small dick. I drive a moped.

I HAVE AN IQ OF 175

There's a house at the north pole. It has 4 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, a 3 car garage and sits on 2.26 acres of land. There are windows on three sides. If you look out the master bedroom window when Mercuriy is in retrograde, you can see the third star in the handle of the big dipper. The driveway is 61 meters long, and the mailbox is red. How many walls point south?

[Savy]

HU 4 STAX

I HAVE A TEN INCH DICK

MY WIFE IS A SUPERMODEL

MY FERRARI IS IN THE GARAGE

I HAVE AN IQ OF 175

single, small penis, no car fml

edit - I genuinely enjoyed this forum a lot more when wuf was posting 100 times an hour. How did it get worse? MMM is literally the only person of value.

[oskar]

It's true, the best data available has me at 143/BB an hour. I just didn't want to crush your motivation

So that's 286 bb's in an hour of live cashgame, which should be around 33 hands, so that's 858 bb/100. Call me skeptical but... no, just call me skeptical.

It also makes me almost certain that you just cut your IQ test result from a pic you found on the internet. I thought there's a change it could be legit if you practice these things, and I see no reason to lie. But there's no reason to lie about your bb/100 either, and this is such an incredibly over the top lie.

banana, the president is a fucking moron. Not a role model you should be looking up to. Don't go around lying about everything - especially if there's nothing to gain!

[Poopadoop]

I genuinely enjoyed this forum a lot more when wuf was posting 100 times an hour. How did it get worse? MMM is literally the only person of value.

Me too. Even his short posts were pure gold.

Calling it now: Walker/Rubio 2016!

Probably wrong

Is Scott Walker the guy who started Dilbert? Otherwise I have no idea.

[BananaStand]

If you've been following along, I've only just this week started to keep extremely detailed results in an app.

The data that currently resides in that app is "the best data available"

It represents roughly four hours of play, over two sessions. +$1,119

What about this seems unreal to you?

EDIT: Wait, I just realized, you guys here probably differentiate between bb and BB. Whatever, I'm still claiming $286/hour at a $1/2 9 handed table.

[oskar]

edit - I genuinely enjoyed this forum a lot more when wuf was posting 100 times an hour. How did it get worse? MMM is literally the only person of value.

Wuf has some serious stretching to do for the mental gymnastics required to think himself out of the hole he got himself in.

[BananaStand]

Is Scott Walker the guy who started Dilbert?

No, that's Scott Adams.

Walker is the governor of Wisconsin

[Poopadoop]

So that's 286 bb's in an hour of live cashgame, which should be around 33 hands, so that's 858 bb/100.

I think you mean 858.0858085808580858... bb/100

Really showing your barely well above average IQ here.

[Savy]

Wuf has some serious stretching to do for the mental gymnastics required to think himself out of the hole he got himself in.

Wuf became too much of a parody of himself which ruined his earnestness which is what made me like him.

I'm going to play live poekr and track my winnings.

[OngBonga]

MMM is literally the only person of value.

This is really uncalled for. I value you. You're mean.

I even value oskar.

Time-out. Serious question: Do brits express dick-size in inches?

Would you rather have a metric fuck ton of bitches, or an imperial fuck ton of bitches?

[Savy]

100bb/hand winner atm won £200.

[oskar]

You've been playing live for months, and you have records for two sessions? And you're an accountant?
Or you're a losing player and you scrap your records every time you go bust to protect your fragile ego?

[OngBonga]

Wuf became too much of a parody of himself which ruined his earnestness which is what made me like him.

Kudos for the most polite way I've ever seen someone say "disappeared up his own arse".

[Savy]

50bb/100 I folded 28o maybe it was a mistake.

[Savy]

Just realised I've been tracking my winnings incorrectly, sorry.

[Savy]

Just got into a multiway pot and took it down 34124bb/100 now.

[BananaStand]

You've been playing live for months, and you have records for two sessions? And you're an accountant?

What would I do with records? Pay taxes?

See....I'm a GOOD accountant

I have a notebook where I write down hands for later study. On the back page I just keep little figures of my total results for each session. It had figures going back several months, I added it all up, estimated my average session is about 4 hours (not really sure, but it's definitely not more than this), and I came up with about $40/hour as my seemingly sustainable win rate.

Then you dickholes called BS, so now I'm keeping super duper records.

$286/hour, and counting.

[Savy]

KK < AA 1000bb deep 0bb/100

[Savy]

3b J9s SB vs BTN open GII w/two pair OTF lost to over pair hitting kicker -1241bb/100