*** Official Politics Shitposting Thread ***

[Poopadoop]

But let's assume for a minute the guy on the ground has no choice once he pulls the gun but to aim it and shoot the guy through the heart. Let's say there's no option for him, once he decides to draw his weapon, to stop and think about what he's actually doing and whether it's a proportionate response to the threat, how it will impact other people besides the person he kills, and how long he could go to jail for.

The question then becomes does he have a right to kill someone for pushing him to the ground? The answer is still 'no, he's a fucking triggered snowflake pussy'.

[BananaStand]

The question then becomes does he have a right to kill someone for pushing him to the ground? The answer is still 'no, he's a fucking triggered snowflake pussy'.

See post 1558 that i just made. You're massively misinformed. He absolutely does have that right. Get that? Read it again. He has the right to decide if his life was in danger, and you don't get to sit in judgement of him just because you have the benefit of slow motion video replay.

If you have a problem with that, then advocate for legislative change. Prosecuting this guy because he shot a black dude, and Al Sharpton cried enough, is flat out WRONG.

[Poopadoop]

See post 1558 that i just made. You're massively misinformed. He absolutely does have that right. Get that? Read it again. He has the right to decide if his life was in danger, and you don't get to sit in judgement of him just because you have the benefit of slow motion video replay.

You're absolutely correct; he has the right to be a triggered snowflake pussy, and he was. Good law you got there.