*** Official Politics Shitposting Thread ***

[oskar]

I told you exactly what the better idea was. And you had a sensible idea when I asked you how you'd enforce it at the canadian border. You can answer it for yourself easily: imagine the immigrants are white, and you'll know what I think the reasonable policy is.

First of all, judicial activism is a thing. Ignoring it is stupid.

Interesting how judicial activism is so biased towards brown people. Really makes you think, huh?

[BananaStand]

I told you exactly what the better idea was.

What? Where? just tell me the post #

So far the suggestions I've seen you endorse are:
1) Don't punish illegal border crossers if they have kids with them (the old policy). this fails because it doesn't satisfy the voters' mandate to enforce the border. The old policy didn't work.
2) You seemed to be ok with shipping the canadian kid back to Trudeau. but that requires the kid to be separated from his family. So I'm not following your logic here? Is family separation only an outrage when it happens to brown people?

And you had a sensible idea when I asked you how you'd enforce it at the canadian border.

My "sensible idea" was to separate the family, throw the hiker in jail, and not give a fuck if they ever see each other again. Are we on the same page? You think that's "sensible"? It requires a family separation. Why is that suddenly ok when we're talking about white people?

You can answer it for yourself easily: imagine the immigrants are white, and you'll know what I think the reasonable policy is.

I'm sure it's very easy to have balls and call someone a racist from behind a keyboard. But honestly, this is a pathetic and transparent debate tactic. Nothing I've said has anything to do with race, and nothing I've advocated would be applied differently at the 'white' border. So if you're calling me a racist, then it's obviously because you can't contend with the facts, refuse to recognize the election results, and will delude yourself into believing ANYTHING if it means complications for Trump's agenda.

It's the last resort of the ineffective demagogue. You can't engage on the actual issue, so you try to label your opponent as some kind deplorable character, so you can take everything he says, put in in a box, shelf it, and remove it from the dialogue.

Be better

Interesting how judicial activism is so biased towards brown people Against anything Trump does. Really makes you think, huh?

Fixed your post.