*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[Jack Sawyer]

LOL

Baby want a cookie?

[BananaStand]

LOL

Baby want a cookie?

Dude...I just got through explaining this to you. People don't like being called deplorable epithets. The guy was clearly trying to engage on some kind of factual, policy-based, discussion. Instead the leftist guy turned around and called him a sharia-monger. That guy had no intention of discussing anything relevant, or cogent to anything. He just wanted to slap an evil-sounding label on the guy so he could put him in a box and remove him from the discussion. Fuck that!

This is where the left goes too far. This is why Donald Trump is president. You can't just throw around words like fascist, racist, misogynist, sexist, etc. You can't just go around calling people nazis because they voted republican. But it's prominent and shockingly effective tactic employed by the left. We catch you not holding a door for a black person....you're a racist and we can put everything you say in a box and remove it from the discussion. We find out you got handsy Gina from accounting at the office christmas party...you're a pig and we can put everything you say in a box and remove it from the discussion.

This guy knew EXACTLY what he was doing when he used the word "sharia". He could have used any number of terms or phrases to challenge Deace for having religiously motivated policy positions. He could have made a compelling constitutional argument for separations of church and state. Instead.....ZOMG SHARIA!! "This guy's one offensive jesus cartoon from hijacking a plane! Let's put him in a box and remove him from the discussion"

Have we talked about what demagoguery means?

What do you think would have been a better result here? Deace was BEGGING for someone to engage with him on concrete matters of policy. Instead they tried to put him in a box. There is no defense for that. They won't meet him on the issues....what else could he do? He could sit there, and try and whine about how they're not being fair to him, or just take it and end up in a box.

instead, by leaving he got the hosts making his point for him. "Maybe 'sharia' was too much". Then with a classic political jujitsue move, the leftist then claims to have his own special definition of 'sharia' that makes it entirely appropriate and not incendiary at all. Come on...who believes that?

So he got the hosts making his point. He refused to let the leftist put him in a box. He's made it so that these deranged left wingers won't be able to get conservative guests to come on their shows. Instead, they'll just have to talk to themselves shrinking into a smaller and smaller echo chamber.

They'll be put in a fucking box!

Well played Deace.

I didn't even know who Deace was before today. Now I do.

Well played indeed.

[Jack Sawyer]

People don't like being called deplorable epithets. The guy was clearly trying to engage on some kind of factual, policy-based, discussion. Instead the leftist guy turned around and called him a sharia-monger.

Well he is a "sharia-monger", how would you call him instead?

[BananaStand]

Well he is a "sharia-monger", how would you call him instead?

Something less turban-ish

[BananaStand]

You're kinda making my point now Jack. What is the goal of the show? Discussion? Or to trap Mr. Deace in a box? How are they going to get conservatives on the show if it's just a setup? "Hey come on our show...we say it's for debate, but we're really gonna confront you on your most controversial positions out of nowhere, for no reason....and trap you in a fucking box!!! ha ha ha "

You call him a "Sharia-monger" as if it's an objective fact. Did Deace ever advocate for something he himself called "sharia"? Did that ever actually happen? I'm genuinely asking. I'm open to changing my mind about this clip if you find me a clip of Deace saying "Christian-Sharia is the way to go". And he actually has to say the word Sharia, and it can't be in a sarcastic context.

The guy was talking about judicial activism. And they tried to put him in a box Jack.

[Jack Sawyer]

You call him a "Sharia-monger" as if it's an objective fact. Did Deace ever advocate for something he himself called "sharia"? Did that ever actually happen? I'm genuinely asking. I'm open to changing my mind about this clip if you find me a clip of Deace saying "Christian-Sharia is the way to go".

First of all, YOU called him a Sharia-monger. I only repeated your words. However, if he is that, should we not call him that?(I should have had "if" in my original response now I see, but fuck it)

However, try not to strawman, ok?

As all the discussions in this video were about other things. During the HLN part they were talking about Mike Huckabee's comments, which were:



And also rick santorum's, as examples of right wingers wanting to turn the country into the Christian version of Saudi Arabia. Assuming you understand what Sharia is. And also assuming you understand about the separation of church and state proviso of the first amendment, you should have some semblance of a notion as to why this is ridiculous. And also why it is a horrible idea that people with this kind of ideology get someone up on the highest Court of your land.

No one gives a shit about who the fuck this dude is, because as you yourself reiterated, you have no idea who he is.

Then the host of this particular youtube video goes on to give his opinion as to why this is straight from the playbook of far rightwingers,

What he was called during this video was a far right wing christian fundamentalist. Which is not really a stretch when you have him saying things like this

https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2...y-based/203481

https://omny.fm/shows/steve-deace-sh...e-show!podcast

And I'm done researching him cuz I don't give a shit about him either. It's not about what they called him, it's about how to turn into a triggered snowflake to avoid having to defend your viewpoints.

Oh, and speaking of Christian Sharia ... Hobby Lobby.

[BananaStand]

First of all, YOU called him a Sharia-monger. I only repeated your words.

No I didn't. It was that faggy short-haired libtard in the video.

However, if he is that, should we not call him that?(I should have had "if" in my original response now I see, but fuck it)

IF he is that.....then there would be evidence. Find me a quote of Deace using the word "sharia".

However, try not to strawman, ok?

Pot...have you met kettle? Deace's whole point was that no one is willing to actually talk about facts and issues. They just want to strawman the republicans into oblivion. And then IT HAPPENED RIGHT THERE. Don't talk to me about strawmen bro.

As all the discussions in this video were about other things. During the HLN part they were talking about Mike Huckabee's comments, which were: And also rick santorum's, as examples of right wingers wanting to turn the country into the Christian version of Saudi Arabia.

Not gonna watch teh Huckabee video. I know what he's about, and it's not "sharia". Invoking the name "Saudi Arabia" is a STRAWMAN Jack. What the fucking hell man???????

And talking about Huckabee's comments would have been entirely appropriate had Huckabee been a guest on the show. HE WASN'T. Deace talked at length about judicial activism. And the rest of the people on the show said..

"oh that's nice, but hey, here's a clip of Huckabee saying something religious. That sounds Saudi Arabian. that sounds like Sharia. We don't like that so we can put Huckabee in a box and remove him from the conversation. Oh and Mr. Deace, since you're from teh same political leanings and religious affiliation as Huckabee.....we can put you in a box too along with everyone else who shares your group identity. No debate. No discussion. No facts. No issues. Just get in the box."

Assuming you understand what Sharia is.

Doesn't matter what my understanding of Sharia is. What matters is what Deace said about sharia. Can you tell me what that was again?

And also assuming you understand about the separation of church and state proviso of the first amendment,

I'm confused now. Do the words "separation of church and state" appear in the first amendment? Do they appear anywhere in the constitution? What are you reading?

you should have some semblance of a notion as to why this is ridiculous. And also why it is a horrible idea that people with this kind of ideology get someone up on the highest Court of your land.

THERE YOU GO AGAIN!!! Deace isn't picking anyone, for any court. Neither is Huckabee. LOL, "People with this kind of ideology". There you go again man. Trying to homogenize entire populations of people based on group identity so you can play 'guilt by association' and put people in boxes. Just because Trump and Deace both claim to worship the same God as Huckabee....doesn't mean that they all think the same, and they all want "sharia"

You know what I think is a horrible idea......anyone with a progressive ideology getting to appoint someone to the highest court in the land. I think that's a horrible idea. You know what we should do.....we should have an election. And whoever wins, gets to appoint the judges.

No one gives a shit about who the fuck this dude is, because as you yourself reiterated, you have no idea who he is.

So it's ok to slander and strawman him on TV?

Then the host of this particular youtube video goes on to give his opinion as to why this is straight from the playbook of far rightwingers

He's allowed to have an opinion Jack. He's a fucking radio host. If you don't like his policy ideas....DEBATE HIM. Don't just slap the word "sharia" on him so everyone watching gasps and writes the guy off as an eastern-religious nutjob. You know EXACTLY why the word "sharia" was used, and it wasn't to further any kind of civil debate.

What he was called during this video was a far right wing christian fundamentalist.

OMG fuck you. Seriously....wake the fuck up.

It's not about what they called him, it's about how to turn into a triggered snowflake to avoid having to defend your viewpoints.

He was obviously extremely happy to defend his viewpoints. They made that impossible. What video were you watching. They guy was BEGGING for the chance to defend his viewpoints. All he wanted was someone to actually listen to him and engage in a conversation. The libtards on the show just wanted to scream past him and tell the audience what a sharia-monger he is.

Oh, and speaking of Christian Sharia ... Hobby Lobby.

God you're just.....just so damn stupid Jack.

[OngBonga]

Well he is a "sharia-monger", how would you call him instead?

If someone on the right used the term "sharia-monger" to describe an opponent it would be viewed as racist.

[oskar]

If someone on the right used the term "sharia-monger" to describe an opponent it would be viewed as racist.

That is a very sad story.


On an unrelated note... having some trouble what to call this guy currently running for congress:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ki2Zn7vD6Ds


edit: Fitzgerald claims the robocall was a smear campaign, but he's still pretty sure that everything we know about the holocaust is a lie.

[Poopadoop]

That is a very sad story.


On an unrelated note... having some trouble what to call this guy currently running for congress:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ki2Zn7vD6Ds


edit: Fitzgerald claims the robocall was a smear campaign, but he's still pretty sure that everything we know about the holocaust is a lie.

Any surprise that's happening in the Live Free or Die state of New Hampshire.

Background music should have been dueling banjos.

[BananaStand]

actually yeah, it would be a surprise if it were happening in New Hampshire

Unsurprisingly, its happening in the socialist republic of Drug-afornia

Theres more than one Concord in the US bud.