*** Official Politics Shitposting Thread ***

[Poopadoop]

And generally, I really don't see why people keep trying to tell me what I should and shouldn't be willing to tolerate. I'll decide that for myself, thanks.

[OngBonga]

And generally, I really don't see why people keep trying to tell me what I should and shouldn't be willing to tolerate. I'll decide that for myself, thanks.

If only you were as tolerant as you are stubborn.

[Poopadoop]

If only you were as tolerant as you are stubborn.

Thanks.

There's very few people I find intolerable. Your FTR-based sample is very small in terms of the wider world, and small samples can lead you to the wrong conclusion if you try to extrapolate.

[MadMojoMonkey]

And generally, I really don't see why people keep trying to tell me what I should and shouldn't be willing to tolerate. I'll decide that for myself, thanks.

To be clear, I've never even hinted at any suggestion over whom you should tolerate.
(If anything I've asked openly that anyone who doesn't want to tolerate him simply ignore him, but that's a totally different beast.)

If any further clarity is needed, my red herring comment was meant to convey that nanners insults are directed toward such flimsy caricatures of any FTR personality that I can not even truly take it seriously that anyone here has been insulted by his asshattery. If anyone has taken offense, then they've painted themselves into that caricature, which says more about them than nanners.

As such, I don't believe you'd stay if nanners had actually insulted you. I believe that nanners comments are so blatantly puerile that you don't take them as any reflection of yourself.

Is that about right?

[Poopadoop]

To be clear, I've never even hinted at any suggestion over whom you should tolerate.
(If anything I've asked openly that anyone who doesn't want to tolerate him simply ignore him, but that's a totally different beast.)

If any further clarity is needed, my red herring comment was meant to convey that nanners insults are directed toward such flimsy caricatures of any FTR personality that I can not even truly take it seriously that anyone here has been insulted by his asshattery. If anyone has taken offense, then they've painted themselves into that caricature, which says more about them than nanners.

As such, I don't believe you'd stay if nanners had actually insulted you. I believe that nanners comments are so blatantly puerile that you don't take them as any reflection of yourself.

Is that about right?

My skin is plenty thick. I object to the asshattery because it lowers the tone of the discussion while adding nothing. And yes, it can get on my nerves when it's directed at me personally and repeatedly. I don't think that makes me different from anyone else, as reticent as many people seem to be to admit that.

And given a choice, I'd rather be somewhere where I don't get exposed to that behaviour either directed at me or at someone else. Either way it's below the standards of discourse I'm interested in.