|
|
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
What makes you think I didn't just read the article and come to that conclusion myself?
your use of quotes in post 1138
Sorry, have you trolled me and you just made up some biased statement on your own and used it as a springboard to lambaste the media?
If so, touche'.
Originally Posted by OngBonga
There once was a time where ethical journalism meant trying one's hardest to not communicate one's own bias when reporting news.
Deeper truth? The deeper truth is that the media is cancer ridden.
Sure, but there has never been a time when journalism has fully lived up to that standard.
Furthermore, who is using the word "ethical," you or them?
I don't see much in the way of ethical news as a goal.
No major news agencies in America are interested in being ethical so much as being entertainment.
I'm curious why you don't describe nanners in the same way, though.
Both are spewing their bias without any acknowledgement of objective fact as though somehow they are purveyors of truth.
Why the defending of one, but the condemnation of the other?
|
Reply With Quote