*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[spoonitnow]

Do you mean 'context cues'? Why yes they do. That's why I pointed out it would be strange to say "I would..." and then not qualify it.

Smooth with the condescension there.

I've said it before, and I'll said it again: There is no cure for liberalism.

[Poopadoop]

Smooth with the condescension there.

I've said it before, and I'll said it again: There is no cure for liberalism.

Oh sorry I thought you would prefer to know the scientific terminology used by linguists rather than the google terminology used by idiots.

[spoonitnow]

Oh sorry I thought you would prefer to know the scientific terminology used by linguists rather than the google terminology used by idiots.

In case you skipped over it, when you search for context cues, the first result is context clues.

But it's typical of liberals to deem anyone they disagree with as idiots, regardless of the situation, so it doesn't surprise me that you'd do the same here.

Edit: There are also more .edu results for clues compared to the cues version by a factor of almost 2:1.

[Poopadoop]

In case you skipped over it, when you search for context cues, the first result is context clues.

But it's typical of liberals to deem anyone they disagree with as idiots, regardless of the situation, so it doesn't surprise me that you'd do the same here.

In case you're a fucking idiot who thinks being the first thing that comes up in a google search makes it somehow right, it isn't.