**** Elections thread *****

[wufwugy]

You'd have to show me the specific event you're referencing.

I call the allegations a lie because I try to not intuit what people mean when they say stuff and instead go with the hard evidence. The evidence presented was demonstrated to be a forgery and was admitted to being forged by the forger. That means that the most concrete thing we have to go on by a significant margin was a lie.

[BananaStand]

You'd have to show me the specific event you're referencing.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...ex-allegations

I know it's Vox and you're instinct is to be skeptical. But cmon wuf. There were like nine times in there where all the guy had to say was "NO". And instead he gave some other answer that could only be interpreted as "yeah, sometimes I did mess around with young girls".

Sounds like Roy thinks that his intentions with the girls were honorable, and that there was adult supervision, so it's all ok.

IT"S NOT FUCKING OK!

Grown people, and underage people don't mix romantically or sexually.

Got it? If any part of that is ambiguous....you can't be a senator.

[Poopadoop]

The evidence presented was demonstrated to be a forgery and was admitted to being forged by the forger. That means that the most concrete thing we have to go on by a significant margin was a lie.

Um, no. The accuser admitted adding the date and location herself after what Moore wrote. The handwriting is clearly diff. than Moore's. That's not forgery, that's record keeping.

Also, the whole case against Moore goes much further than a signed yearbook, which itself proves nothing. The most damning thing is what Banana said, where he basically gives himself up.

[wufwugy]

Um, no. The accuser admitted adding the date and location herself after what Moore wrote. The handwriting is clearly diff. than Moore's. That's not forgery, that's record keeping.

Yes, thank you. She admitted to altering part of what was altered.

Also, the whole case against Moore goes much further than a signed yearbook, which itself proves nothing. The most damning thing is what Banana said, where he basically gives himself up.

I'm confused. What did he give himself up to? He denied sexual assault and didn't deny non-sexual assault

[Poopadoop]

Yes, thank you. She admitted to altering part of what was altered.

Well, unless she's playing 3D chess then she fucked up. If you forge something, you shouldn't admit to forging a small, irrelvant part of it as that gives your opponents an excuse to say things like you just did.

I'm confused. What did he give himself up to? He denied sexual assault and didn't deny non-sexual assault

He went out of his way NOT to deny dating underage girls as a 30+ man. What do you need to convince you he's a fucking creep?

[wufwugy]

He went out of his way NOT to deny dating underage girls as a 30+ man. What do you need to convince you he's a fucking creep?

Thanks for making this point, because I'm not talking about this. He probably dated the way stated. I don't care.