|
 Originally Posted by Savy
I've made too many posts to count in the past (maybe mostly on 2p2 but I think I have on here too) that the whole value bet/ bluff was just a very primitive way of thinking about poker. Lots of people have argued against me about it, much better players than I ever was, but I' m right.
The reason you bet is because it's the most +EV thing to do.
Guess you're thinking about something like betting for protection? i.e. we bet ace high or flopped bottom pair because villain will fold out his 15% equity? If so, I'm with you in the right situations.
 Originally Posted by Savy
Overly simplistic definitions are basically
Value - enough worse hands call to make it profitable
bluff - enough better hands fold to make it profitable
It my be simplistic, but it's the best definition.
|