|
03-18-2017 12:29 AM
#1
| |
![]()
| |
|
03-18-2017 01:56 AM
#2
| |
| |
|
03-18-2017 12:05 PM
#3
| |
![]()
|
Indeed. The urban plantation hypothesis* is an atypical situation in which the promises are kept. We've seen for several decades this symbiotic relationship play out in some parts of the country. The promise is more handouts in exchange for the vote, and both happen. |
Last edited by wufwugy; 03-18-2017 at 12:11 PM. | |
|
03-18-2017 07:04 AM
#4
| |
|
| |
|
03-18-2017 09:02 AM
#5
| |
![]()
|
That's the only reason the Democratic party exists. |
|
03-18-2017 12:11 PM
#6
| |
![]()
|
Some say that without the urban plantation deal, the Democrats could only win a handful of districts and states. |
|
03-18-2017 12:39 PM
#7
| |
| |
|
03-18-2017 01:46 PM
#8
| |
It's still a million miles away from slavery. I mean, is the voter under contract and obliged to vote for the party giving him money? Or does he just make the vote because he knows it is the best chance of him continuing his lifestyle? He is not compelled by anyone to vote a particular way, he is only compelled by his own ideology. | |
|
| |