|
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
You DID make the point about an express lane over the border.
Nope.
If you read my actual words, rather than scan them and run them past your inner filter for what you're allowed to be offended by, you will find a complete lack of any confidence in my post, as well as a lot of speculation.
I made exactly 0 points, so whatever you think you read is, again, nothing to do with me.
Here. Bold added for clarity.
 Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
However, if it is decided that our policy on immigration is dumb, ineffective, and that building a wall is same same, then perhaps a reform involving registration of certain immigrant classes is in order. Like TSA pre-screening, or something. Like, OK, tell us who you are and we'll do a full background check one time, and then you can pass through the express lane.
IDK if this addresses a totally different issue, though. There'd still need to be an amnesty for past criminal acts, in light of the new law, and loads of people are against that idea.
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
If you care to explain how you could prevent from being abused, go ahead.
I didn't propose any changes to what constitutes a full background check.
If it's abusable in my brainstormed proposal, then it's already abusable, and a non-sequitur to attribute that flaw as a fault in my proposal.
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
Otherwise, we'll just agree it was a stupid idea.
We can agree that the idea you attribute to me, which is not my idea, is stupid.
|