|
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
I wouldn't say it's had little impact. There is certainly a 'balloon effect' to some degree. But crime is down. If drug usage is up, it's because the other side is fighting back with more production, more potent drugs, and cheaper prices. Our war tactics must evolve to counter that. And that means stopping the flow of drugs into this country. Eventually, it will get harder and harder for the bad guys to come up with new ways to get to the market. When that happens, they'll move on to a different market. Let them take their shit to Argentina.
That's not how things work. Dealers don't go 'oh geez there's a 25% chance our mules will get busted, better switch to another market'. They say 'ok 25% of our mules get busted, better raise the price'
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
We did it in Columbia. We poured 8 billion into efforts to destroy coca fields and prosecute drug lords.
You made hardly a dent in the coke market, if price is any indication. Not exactly a roaring success. Seriously, stop thinking Narcos is a documentary - it's not.
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
When the poorest of Mexican citizens can't be pushed out of the country and passed off on the US, they'll start demanding reforms, just like the Columbians did
No idea where this argument starts and where it ends.
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
Then we'll see who wins the war.
We've already been seeing for forty years. Drugs are still everywhere. Believing the whole 'securing the southern border' thing will change that in any significant way is wishful thinking.
|