|
|
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
Ok, whatever you say.
So, can you explain to me why you have a problem with Trump compromising and backing off from an extreme policy that you hated to begin with? Can you explain why people who didn't take Trump literally at every turn should now "see the light"?
Because earlier, it was pretty clear that you were equating the actual travel ban policy with a hypothetical 'muslim ban' policy presented during the campaign.
If a president decides to take the least disruptive course of action (it's only 7 countries, and it's temporary), how is that, in your words "egregious", or "dangerous"?
It seems like you're equating the moderate policy with an extreme one. Rather than admit that the president is not the fascist monster you thought he was, you now seem to be saying that this moderate policy is just the first step toward the extreme policy.
The fact that the most egregious of these was stopped (at least temporarily) doesn't remove the danger of him trying.
|
Reply With Quote