|
|
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
The important word here is 'votes'. Note how it is different that 'a vote'. You're conflating the two.
Looking at it this way doesn't tell much of the story. If the reasoning that the individual vote doesn't matter was correct, it would also be correct to say that voting itself doesn't matter, yet that is clearly not the case. If somebody wants to understand the vote, they can't just do a couple bits of arithmetic and call it a day.
How you do you know that? They could have dumped ten billion dollars into ads, hired people to go door to door, used all kinds of tricks, and changed the vote decisively. But not because they influenced one person, because they influenced thousands or hundreds of thousands or millions.
The causality those things have with influencing the vote is weak.
We've mostly been taught that history is about big men, but academia has been coming around to the better explanation that history is about movements and ideas.
But if you think it's because you've got a good chance of making a difference with your one vote, you're just deluded and nothing more.
I don't think that, but the cool thing is that "does your vote count" is not the question. Nobody's vote counts and yet voting counts. Square that circle.
|