Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

Ayn Rand Philosophy, Objectivism, Science, Self-interest

Results 1 to 75 of 159

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    So rational actor = not a literal puppet?

    Wait, are we literally saying that all creatures are rational actors, then?

    This broad definition no longer even applies specifically to humans.
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    So rational actor = not a literal puppet?

    Wait, are we literally saying that all creatures are rational actors, then?

    This broad definition no longer even applies specifically to humans.
    We're saying that people are preferential actors and that it is rational to be preferential. In a sense, this is the most basic type of rationality. It's not a thoroughly thoughtful abstraction, but it certainly makes sense that when the options are (1) act on preference, (2) do not act on preference, or (3) act or do not act on preference randomly, then (1) is the most rational.

    I don't see anything wrong with the point that it could apply to other species, other than it not being terribly useful since we're not modeling economic behavior of other species.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •