Russians vs. Americans: A Werewolf Game for October 2015

[wufwugy]

I feel like I made that exact post a few games ago bout someone. Got deja vu

Wuf. Your vote is locked on yourself. You have given up all accountability. That's my point. Not you can do or say changes that u gave up accountability

but i havent. if batm dies and he's a villager and people say "now let's look at people who wanted him dead", i am NOT off the hook. i mean, only if people are playing really badly would i be off the hook.

the first rule of wagonomics is to not assess them based purely on the fact of existence of the votes.

[SuperMonkeyFace]

but i havent. if batm dies and he's a villager and people say "now let's look at people who wanted him dead", i am NOT off the hook. i mean, only if people are playing really badly would i be off the hook.

the first rule of wagonomics is to not assess them based purely on the fact of existence of the votes.

My wagonomic assessment would be a smart sold would do that early in the day to abandon ask accountability to decide the lynch

What if the wagons are tied? If you're a wolf. Smrt move. If you're a villagery, dumb move, you can't help by saying " oh but technically my vote is on him "

[wufwugy]

My wagonomic assessment would be a smart sold would do that early in the day to abandon ask accountability to decide the lynch

What if the wagons are tied? If you're a wolf. Smrt move. If you're a villagery, dumb move, you can't help by saying " oh but technically my vote is on him "

sure. not everything is the same.

my point is that you don't find wolves based on where their votes are, you find them based on the reasoning and dynamics behind their arguments, even if a vote doesn't accompany their arguments.

ive learned this the hard way, by getting burned every single time i do serious in depth wagonomics analyses. it's all about the argument. by the end of it all, villagers end up with more things like consistency than wolves.