|
|
 Originally Posted by spoonitnow
fyp
The ruling says that same-sex marriage is protected. I don't know what point you're trying to make as a differentiation between the actual document of the Constitution and the body of people whose job is to interpret said document.
And Roberts, in a biting dissent far more harsh than his usual style, said the decision was “an act of will, not legal judgment” with “no basis in the Constitution or this court’s precedent.”
The dissenting opinions agree with you, but they are the dissenters, not the majority.
|
Reply With Quote