Varchertine's Werewolf Game Thread

[MadMojoMonkey]

this

i see zero value in keeping partners hidden. every lynch includes automatic death of the partner. let's be real, none of us are gonna vote to lynch our partners. this is really just a game of "which two players do we want to die". even in a 3v1 situation, it is always correct to not vote your partner since you know that 50% of the deaths in the lynch are village

it's me n teh hoopster

Keep lynching wuf for posting ill-conceived crap like this.

[wufwugy]

Keep lynching wuf for posting ill-conceived crap like this.

in 3v1, if you vote for your partner, you are opting to kill one target for potential wolf instead of two. given how big margins of errors are in ww, it is virtually always wrong to vote for your partner

[MadMojoMonkey]

in 3v1, if you vote for your partner, you are opting to kill one target for potential wolf instead of two. given how big margins of errors are in ww, it is virtually always wrong to vote for your partner

In 3v1, you have an entire thread of information behind you to suss out the wolf.


How about you focus on people instead of mechanics for a while, and maybe - maybe - find an argument to move my policy lynch off of you.
Noting that it will also kill hoopy isn't sleuthing.

And we're nowhere near deadline, and you have 2 votes... it's not like you needed to pull out a ringer to save yourself.

[wufwugy]

In 3v1, you have an entire thread of information behind you to suss out the wolf.


How about you focus on people instead of mechanics for a while, and maybe - maybe - find an argument to move my policy lynch off of you.
Noting that it will also kill hoopy isn't sleuthing.

And we're nowhere near deadline, and you have 2 votes... it's not like you needed to pull out a ringer to save yourself.

rate of accuracy of reads is far too low. i think it is always correct to vote for the non-partner unless you get an actual slip up or something from your partner. but if you're just trying to figure out his play with your smarts, the odds favor you far more to just take the shot at the wolf being one of the other two partners

[MadMojoMonkey]

herpy derp derp. Thinking is hard. Herp derp. I'd rather just decide now, rather than allow my brain to use up the precious oxygen needed for my gut. Herp derp herp derp derpy derp.

FYP

[wufwugy]

FYP

forgive me for making rational arguments.

consider the previous game, with a final day of me gabe luco jkds. if there was just one wolf and me n gabe were linked. i would need a damn good reason to vote for him because the other option would be to get a freebie in jkds and luco dying at the same time. from my perspective, i either get to kill gabe alone or jkds/luco together

granted it can be possible to have good enough reads where we think that the probability fo gabe being wolf is higher than the probability of it being either luco or jkds, but if this was representative of ww, it would mean that ww is inherently imba against the village. the fact that we believe that having just one kill choice on 3v1 is good enough for the village to win a fair amount of time, it means that two kill options in the same spot is incredibly awesome