This post is like giving relationship advice...it's always easier to see the correct answer when it is someone else. Sure, reading the post, I immediately think that you are up against a better hand and it is a fold. But, if I am playing the hand, I probably talk myself into a call as the clock runs down and then mutter to myself for the next 10 minutes that I have to quit making big river calls.

Not knowing anything about the villain or your image, it's difficult to do much reliable analysis, but I have a hard time seeing this as a full house. I'm not sure I see the play that leads to a full house at the river. If you flop a set on a monotone board, do you really just call 2 streets, keeping in mind that neither player has a read on the other? If another club comes, you are either 1) now losing 2) getting no action. And a club is going to hit about 38% of the time by the river. I think the average player definitely raises a set on either the flop or turn. Obviously, arguments can be made for just calling, but usually only with a read on the opponent.

Like Griffey, I suspect that a lot of Axs are in his range, given what I see at 10nl. That hand makes sense across every street. Not that it matters much which hand beats you. A bad river call is still a bad river call.

Having said that, I have seen enough bizarre play at 10nl, that it could be 63o for all I know!

I have a question to those of you that play Zoom, or some such variant. Why? I don't mean that facetiously. I really am curious what the advantages are. Is it just volume? Are the opponents much worse? Is there an advantage to being less readable? How much do you lose from not having reads and table flow info?

thanks