There are wild disagreements about how to set a hand like this--I would have set it AA/5/J8 because I think that if you're lucky enough to be dealt an FL pair, it should always go on top--but let's just look at the line you took after the set. (I should grant that with the cards that actually came, I would have fouled with my set, but I'd argue that over the long haul it's still likely to be a more profitable line.)

Anyway, when the first draw brings QK3, I agree that putting the 3 on the bottom is automatic, but putting the Q on top instead of the K doesn't make much sense. WAZZUP is showing you a Q, but the Ks are fully live, so you should play the K up instead of the Q because not only is the K more live than the Q, but it also pays 1 more point in royalties if you make a pair on top. When the next draw brings 976, I think it's a better to play 9 up and the fully-live 7 in the mid (because if another K doesn't come, you can still make 99 up for 4 points, and this play leaves a space in the mid to make trip As or two pair if the flush comes for the bottom). The third draw comes K72, leaving you with a tough decision. Do you make the FL pair up and 2-pair in the mid (relying on catching 2 hearts on the end), or set the K low and the 7 mid, giving you a 4-flush on the bottom and 2-pair in the mid? Since you can see 8 hearts between your hand and WAZZUP's, and WAZZUP may have mucked one or more hearts for all you know, I think playing the K low and the 7 mid has to be the better play. When the last draw brings JT9, you play the T low to complete the flush, and the 9 on top to finish with this hand:

JUKER1



Discard: Q 6 2 J

Notice that it is stronger in both the top and the mid, and it pays 4 points more in royalties than the hand you made with the line you played.