Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumSmall Stakes NL Hold'em

Hand Analysis

Results 1 to 14 of 14

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    On the river it should be, his bet needs to work 48/(48+51) = 48.4%, so you need to continue with 51.5%.

    If we're adjusting our call down ranges, based on villains cbet tendencies, this is fine but we're obviously exploiting villain in this case and not trying to play GTO.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by griffey24 View Post
    If we're adjusting our call down ranges, based on villains cbet tendencies, this is fine but we're obviously exploiting villain in this case and not trying to play GTO.
    This makes sense. I was wondering if we could combine the two as a rule of thumb though e.g.

    - Let's say we flat 100 combos
    - Villain cbets half pot, so GTO would tell us to defend 67%
    - But we estimate villain will only cbet 50% of the time on a given flop texture

    Could we then crudely use:

    100*67%*50% = 33 combos

    as a rough guide for our defence?

    Obviously the assumption about cbetting frequency is pretty unreliable..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •