You're not arguing with me any more, you're arguing against price controls and all that. My position was that the morality of the free market given in your video was not the best method to address the needs of people in the situation it described. You keep trying to shove me back into your economics world by fitting what I'm saying into what you understand.

"I'm assuming you are in favor of a FEMA-type organization that apportions resources and stimulates supply."

"Supply and demand are simply far more responsive to one another in a free market than in a price-controlled market. I'm not sure how that is even arguable. Less incentive = less response and greater delay."

I'm focusing on how people act in the world and you're focusing on how people act in a free market.