Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

Unsure whether to c-bet?

Results 1 to 37 of 37

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelion View Post
    Example: We have A T and X-ray specs. Villain has 22. We get into a blindwar and end up 5bet shoving with 51% equity for 100bbs.

    Q1) Are we hoping he calls or folds?

    Q2) Is it possible for him to fold a better hand, or call with a worse hand?

    Q3) What type of bet is this? e.g. bluff/valuebet

    Q4) Are there any other reasons to make a bet besides folding a better hand, or getting value from a worse hand?
    1) Hope he calls, 'cause our 51% equity is more than his 49%.
    2) It is not possible for him to fold a better hand, because we have x-ray specs and know that our hand has more equity. It is possible for him to call with a worse hand for the same reason.
    3) This is a value bet, Hero has the most equity.
    4) No.*

    *caveat: meta-game against a tough reg, but this is really just because we're playing ranges, not hands.
    Last edited by MadMojoMonkey; 04-13-2013 at 05:36 PM.
  2. #2
    I strongly suggest you work out the EV of:

    100bb stacks

    Villain raises to 3bb.
    We 3bet to 9bb.
    Villain 4bets to 22bb
    We shove for 100bb.

    EV of villain folding vs Calling when we have 51% equity.
    gabe: Ive dropped almost 100k in the past 35 days.

    bigspenda73: But how much did you win?
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    1) Hope he calls, 'cause our 51% equity is more than his 49%.
    2) It is not possible for him to fold a better hand, because we have x-ray specs and know that our hand has more equity. It is possible for him to call with a worse hand for the same reason.
    3) This is a value bet, Hero has the most equity.
    4) No.*

    *caveat: meta-game against a tough reg, but this is really just because we're playing ranges, not hands.
    we'd prefer he folds because folding would be a mistake.
  4. #4
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelion View Post
    You need to make sure you are calculating EV from the same point in each case. Either both from the start of the hand, or both from the point of the decision.
    I should have known something was amiss when things came out like that, but !@#$ migraine headaches do weird things to my thought process.

    From the moment of Villain's decision:
    If Villain folds, Hero's EV is:
    100bb + 22bb = 122bb
    All of the chips in the middle.

    If Villain calls, Hero's EV is Hero's equity times the size of the pot:
    51%*200bb = 102bb

    Quote Originally Posted by Pelion View Post
    Also note that the first of these is an EV calculation. The second is an equity calculation. The two are not the same and you can't draw a direct comparison between these numbers.
    The sum of all probabilities (equities) times their associated outcomes (profit) is the EV.
    51%*200bb + 49%*0bb = 102bb

    Quote Originally Posted by Pelion View Post
    When villain calls, our EV is the difference between what we expect to end the hand with and our stack at the moment.
    Hero's stack at the moment when he's all in is 0bb.

    I see that you consider Hero's stack to be 91bb in the following analysis, which is Hero's stack prior to the shove.
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelion View Post
    so EV if villain folds is +31bb.

    EV if villain calls is 102 - 91 = +11b

    You can also work this out as a 109bb (pot + villain stack) win 51% of the time, or a 91bb (our stack) loss 49% of the time. 0.51*109 - 0.49*91 = +11bb

    31bb > 11bb so we want him to fold
    This is, of course, all true.

    We both show a spread of 20bb in favor of Villain folding.

    Quote Originally Posted by Micro2Macro View Post
    we'd prefer he folds because folding would be a mistake.
    Yes. I see it now. Thanks.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •