|
Thanks for the replies, guys. This gives me food for thought.
I used to take a bet/bet/bet line with all TPGK-type hands against almost all villains, but I kept getting owned by sets and two-pair hands. At the time I wrote it off as running into the top end of ranges (and against a lot of villains, this is true). As I got better, I started classifying villains according to how weak they call down two or three large-ish bets. I would still bet/bet/bet if I thought the villain had a fair amount of weaker TPs or worse in his calling range, but I started checking one of the streets if I thought the villain was the type to only call three bets with TPGK or better. This adjustment seems to be working (at least better than indiscriminately betting); however, as you guys are pointing out, I think I have over-adjusted to the point of missing out on value.
Bean Counter, I get your point that I put the villain on too wide of a range (fair enough; I'm still really bad at this sort of thing, especially since I don't have a HUD for stats), but how can you be so confident that he always raises his sets and never shows up with A8s or A5s?
|