Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

10nl AQs BU

Results 1 to 12 of 12

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    spoonitnow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    14,219
    Location
    North Carolina
    Quote Originally Posted by mondayscool View Post
    edit: sorry for the ramble, i get to the point at the last bit

    Now I'm probably way off in my reasoning here but that's what this forum is for so here goes...

    if i just call the squeeze pre does this not lead to me making mistakes postflop? like either folding the best hand on some runouts or calling off when i'm way behind on other runouts? whereas if i get all in pre i realize all my equity without being able to make a mistake postflop.

    i realize this reasoning is likely erroneous but i can't quite put my finger on exactly why. i guess it could be just wrong to get all in pre here to begin with, though that depends on how much of villain's squeezing range he jams/calls/folds, so that's probably where i should start!

    so i loosely assume that this type of villain would be jamming like ATs+, ATo+, 88+, something like that, maybe KQs, KQo (how does this range look, not sure if it's too wide or too narrow?)

    okay now i've got my thoughts in order. if i 4bet pre for value here i think i need to be 50%+ vs. his calling AND his jamming range! is this correct?
    The logic in the bold portion above is terrible and should absolutely never, ever, ever be given any amount of credibility. If the bold was important enough to sway your decision, then you could never call 3-bets pre-flop.

    What it really comes down to is that you don't want to call the 3-bet because you're scared of playing the hand post-flop. To get over that, you need to realize that it's no different than any other poker situation. He has a range, you have a range, there's a flop SPR, and you go from there. It's like if you raised preflop with AQs, he called with the same range that he has now, and you're seeing a flop.
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by spoonitnow View Post
    The logic in the bold portion above is terrible and should absolutely never, ever, ever be given any amount of credibility. If the bold was important enough to sway your decision, then you could never call 3-bets pre-flop.

    What it really comes down to is that you don't want to call the 3-bet because you're scared of playing the hand post-flop. To get over that, you need to realize that it's no different than any other poker situation. He has a range, you have a range, there's a flop SPR, and you go from there. It's like if you raised preflop with AQs, he called with the same range that he has now, and you're seeing a flop.
    Sound logic is sound, thanks spoon.

    I suppose too if I'm always afraid of playing flops in 3bet pots I'll get the experience required to get better at it far slower.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •