Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

preflop positional stats -> obv leaks? - fr

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up

    Default preflop positional stats -> obv leaks? - fr

    so, fullring and nit gotta nit cos i was getting silly with playing too many hands and it was costing me sanity. So i played a couple of sessions trying to tighten up, and it worked, dropped vpip by 9 and etc. But, still seems leaky some, particularly sb and calling too much from bb and button. Anything else jump out as places to focus on preflop? and yeah, in b4 'that 0.8% utg open limp seems pretty high.'
    filtered on > 5 players at table.
  2. #2
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    You should be ashamed - almost as nitty as me!

    Only 2 differences I can see from my own stats are you are a lot looser on the BTN - but i think this is to do with table volume rather than choice - and your MP1 VPIP is much looser than mine (assume you are raising all PPs?)

    But again thats probably workload per table for me vs what id play if i played less tables.

    Kind of surprised at your 'lowish' AGG stats in Lp position as well - they look like my AGG levels when i fell into b/e even play for 200k hands playing too much fit/fold
    Last edited by Miffed22001; 09-11-2012 at 02:56 AM.
  3. #3
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    Out of curiosity - i saw a post by mpethybridge (sp) about river call efficency, and now cant find it.

    What is yours over such a sample?
  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up
    Quote Originally Posted by Miffed22001 View Post
    You should be ashamed - almost as nitty as me!
    hanging my head as i type

    Quote Originally Posted by Miffed22001 View Post
    Only 2 differences I can see from my own stats are you are a lot looser on the BTN - but i think this is to do with table volume rather than choice - and your MP1 VPIP is much looser than mine (assume you are raising all PPs?)
    yeah, 15 tables<<<<<24. MP1 i open most pairs most of the time, yep

    Quote Originally Posted by Miffed22001 View Post
    Kind of surprised at your 'lowish' AGG stats in Lp position as well - they look like my AGG levels when i fell into b/e even play for 200k hands playing too much fit/fold
    this could be due to me calling pre quite a lot from co and particularly button? not sure

    Quote Originally Posted by Miffed22001 View Post
    Out of curiosity - i saw a post by mpethybridge (sp) about river call efficency, and now cant find it.

    What is yours over such a sample?
    by position there are four NAs, so not sure if the sample size is enough? overall in that sample it's 1.5, made up of 0, 0, 15.3, 1.8, and 8.

    Quote Originally Posted by mpeth View Post
    River Call Efficiency is a Goldilocks stat.
    Quote Originally Posted by mpeth View Post

    What I mean by that is that it is a leak for your RCE to be either too high or too low.
    it's in his blog.
    River Call Efficiency Explained | mpethypoker.com
    i'll read it shortly
  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,441
    Location
    IRC, Come join me!
    Pretty sure RCI is completely worthless unless your sample size is absolutely massive. I mean come on you have so many obvious river calls/folds(or at least they should be) that the times you actually seriously have to sit their and count combos aren't going to make a huge difference on the overall stat. It's only useful if you are calling WAY too much or folding WAY too much otherwise it's probably the most worthless stat.

    Also looking at SB/BB and isn't as valuable as looking at SB/BB versus steal attempts.
  6. #6
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    Quote Originally Posted by Icanhastreebet View Post
    Pretty sure RCI is completely worthless unless your sample size is absolutely massive. I mean come on you have so many obvious river calls/folds(or at least they should be) that the times you actually seriously have to sit their and count combos aren't going to make a huge difference on the overall stat. It's only useful if you are calling WAY too much or folding WAY too much otherwise it's probably the most worthless stat.

    Also looking at SB/BB and isn't as valuable as looking at SB/BB versus steal attempts.
    Suspect I have the call too much leak.... Mine look pretty crap over 100k
  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up
    Quote Originally Posted by Icanhastreebet View Post
    Also looking at SB/BB and isn't as valuable as looking at SB/BB versus steal attempts.
    cheers - I had been defending too much and probably badly and now it seems i've gone the other way. I was basically just giving away my blinds over this sample, without really noticing. Looks like i call too much vs steals, forgetting that positional disadvantage is huge - I need to think about how this is affected when ranges are poorly defined.
    cheers for the pointer
    over that sample:
    steal faced when i'm in blinds, both about 17%
    sb vs steal: fold - 84% raise - 6%
    bb vs steal: fold - 80% raise - 10%
    Last edited by daven; 09-11-2012 at 06:15 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •