TPTK small 4 bet pot

[d0zer]

he doez thiz bet cauze he knowz you will never fold AK

Fish don't think like this, and I want to know how your nitbrain can give a villain you know very little about 1 combo 99% of the time.

[Razvan729]

Fish don't think like this, and I want to know how your nitbrain can give a villain you know very little about 1 combo 99% of the time.

well you gave your own anzwer in the bold.

fish you say? i agree, he could be, in this case he could have here A5, A4, 55,44 , other Ax.,TT+

but you also say " villain you know very little " so you cant really asume he regularly goez AI here w/ worse Ax , unerpair, bluff and OP wrote : "villain is 25/6 over solid sample 3b 2%" so you cant asume iz regurlarly 3betting/calling crap.

so, combining the little info ( no read other then stat) and the 2% 3bet over solid sample, the only logic conclusion w/o any other info is that we are beat here always by AA. he can of course have worse, i dont doubt that, but you have no info to you make believe he bluffz/zemibluffz enough timez to make a +EV call here zince we need 44% equity, a lot of equity we need juzt to breakeven.

if on thiz flop he doez thiz 60% timez AA and 40 % timez w/ any kind of crap, the call iz ztill bad and -EV.

you zaid you got the money in good, but w/ juzt one hand of bluff cauze you gave no other readz about hiz bluffing, can you be zure he doez it enough timez zince he did not zhow maniac tendenciez in your zolid zample?