Would WufILikeFatChicksWugy bang these?

[boost]

last chick is ok, but the 2 before that are just plain fat. Theres just no way to sugar coat it. No one cares if you like fat chicks wuf, just dont try to pretend that that is muscle or something.

The presence of fat does not make a girl fat. The thing is, some girls, with the same amount of body fat, will indeed be fat. But some girls carry it in the right places, and the pale girl carries that fat really well. She is not fat. She isn't toned, but she isn't sloppy, with rolls all over the place. She's pretty much a living embodiment of a renaissance depiction of a woman.

[bode]

The presence of fat does not make a girl fat. The thing is, some girls, with the same amount of body fat, will indeed be fat. But some girls carry it in the right places, and the pale girl carries that fat really well. She is not fat. She isn't toned, but she isn't sloppy, with rolls all over the place. She's pretty much a living embodiment of a renaissance depiction of a woman.

correct. but the presence of THAT much fat does make those girls fat. Just because she carries it better than most doesn't mean that she isn't still fat. If i have to chose between that pale blond girl or the pig beast on the left in the OP, obv. i'm choosing the blonde. She is on the pretty side of the fat girl spectrum, but she is still fat. arguing that she fits the renaissance depiction of a woman is just silly.

[Galapogos]

She is on the pretty side of the fat girl spectrum, but she is still fat. arguing that she fits the renaissance depiction of a woman is just silly.

^^ Did not study the renaissance in school obv.

[boost]

correct. but the presence of THAT much fat does make those girls fat. Just because she carries it better than most doesn't mean that she isn't still fat.

Meh, I disagree.

If i have to chose between that pale blond girl or the pig beast on the left in the OP, obv. i'm choosing the blonde. She is on the pretty side of the fat girl spectrum,

I'm with you so far...

but she is still fat.

again, no.

arguing that she fits the renaissance depiction of a woman is just silly.

What.

[bode]

^^ Did not study the renaissance in school obv.

What.

meh, not what i meant. I meant that obviously she fits the bill for a renaissance period woman, but using that as an argument was silly.

[d0zer]

meh, not what i meant. I meant that obviously she fits the bill for a renaissance period woman, but using that as an argument was silly.

Well if she does fit the bill of a renaissance period woman, and that was once considered the pinnacle of female beauty, surely the argument speaks to the impact of cultural influences on beauty, and isn't silly at all. You're basically arguing that you're a slave to modern sensibilities at this point.

That being said, the last chick that wuffwuggy posted is a butterface AND a fatty, and...well...two strikes and....you better have a great personality