#1 overall winner at $10/$20 NL on Pokerstars in 2010

Originally Posted by d0zer

Thanks. I figured as much, just had to take the obvious jab as that's how the story kind of reads.

At those stakes, aren't the # of tables so few that you have to end up dipping into adjacent levels? No significant amount of 5/10 or 25/50 in the mix?

Well if you check out my stats at those levels, you see that I did play a few hands if there were not enough good 10/20 games running...but 10/20 was my main game.

#1 overall winner at $10/$20 NL on Pokerstars in 2010 - My story

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Hybrid View

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

01-06-2012 11:28 AM #1
d0zer View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message View Blog Entries Join Date Jul 2007 Posts 4,963	Thanks. I figured as much, just had to take the obvious jab as that's how the story kind of reads. At those stakes, aren't the # of tables so few that you have to end up dipping into adjacent levels? No significant amount of 5/10 or 25/50 in the mix?

01-06-2012 11:38 AM #2
YourDoom View Profile View Forum Posts View Blog Entries Visit Homepage BANNED Join Date Jan 2012 Posts 12 Location USA	Originally Posted by d0zer Thanks. I figured as much, just had to take the obvious jab as that's how the story kind of reads. At those stakes, aren't the # of tables so few that you have to end up dipping into adjacent levels? No significant amount of 5/10 or 25/50 in the mix? Well if you check out my stats at those levels, you see that I did play a few hands if there were not enough good 10/20 games running...but 10/20 was my main game.