2nd Set vs. PF 3Bet

Originally Posted by DoubleJ

OK, so right line, but for the wrong reason. i just didn't fancy a 50:50 for my stack, so chickened out

meh

also - how are u reading 'passive' from 20/15? I thought passive is characterised by a big gap between VPIP and PFR?

PFR is pretty low for 20 vpip. But mainly because he's a 5NL reg who obv isn't too crazy, isn't 3 betting wide etc. Just experience I guess.

10-18-2011 04:13 PM #1
DoubleJ View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message View Blog Entries Join Date Mar 2011 Posts 865 Location Still on that feckin' island!	Originally Posted by Carroters ...Think flatting pre is easily better. OK, so right line, but for the wrong reason. i just didn't fancy a 50:50 for my stack, so chickened out meh also - how are u reading 'passive' from 20/15? I thought passive is characterised by a big gap between VPIP and PFR?
	don't want no tutti-frutti, no lollipop
Reply With Quote

10-18-2011 04:43 PM #2
Carroters View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message View Blog Entries Visit Homepage Join Date Mar 2008 Posts 2,814 Location Da Amberlamps	Originally Posted by DoubleJ OK, so right line, but for the wrong reason. i just didn't fancy a 50:50 for my stack, so chickened out meh also - how are u reading 'passive' from 20/15? I thought passive is characterised by a big gap between VPIP and PFR? PFR is pretty low for 20 vpip. But mainly because he's a 5NL reg who obv isn't too crazy, isn't 3 betting wide etc. Just experience I guess.

Reply With Quote

2nd Set vs. PF 3Bet

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Hybrid View

Posting Permissions