|
 Originally Posted by philly and the phanatics
because his reasoning was that he had the page open a lot before voting for wuf...seems pretty thin, whereas SDM is all over the place, cannot get his story straight
I asked you what was unclear about the quotes and you ignored me.
i agree that SDM is all over the place
I'm quite firmly in one place.
Day 1: fake out as seer
Day 2: withdraw seer claim before real seer came out
"Good villagers" is not a contradiction in terms especially when a random bullet is more likely to hit a villager than a wolf. Since the player is more likely to be a vilager more often than a wolf, we'relikely losing a good villager if that good player is shot. Therefore, save bullets on decent players for reads that they actually are likely wolves and shoot the tard in the head that is determined to cause us nothing but grief.
Completely irrelevant to what I said: a "good villager" means nothing because you can't prove you're a villager. Now you're just trying to justify the vig blindly shooting into a crowd that has 3 wolves and 12 villagers, 1 of which is the angel. Imagine how brilliant you'd fucking look if you told the vig to shoot into the crowd and he knocked out the angel. Remember the game where JKDS shot the seer? Lucky for the village, the vig knows better than me (and bigred ) and knows to keep his gun holstered except for when it really matters.
But hey, you would rather the vig help the wolves win the game, go ahead and open fire when you're the vig. I'm going to laugh my ass off when you unload and hit a special, causing the village to lose.
|