I think I'd of folded here pre as well. But is there not an argument here for a 3-bet?
04-17-2011 03:01 PM
#1
| |
I think I'd of folded here pre as well. But is there not an argument here for a 3-bet? | |
04-17-2011 03:03 PM
#2
| |
W/o more info on villain I'd say no. | |
| |
04-17-2011 03:21 PM
#3
| |
3 bet bluffing tight UTG fish raisers who will fold to 3 bets around 10% of the time or less is really bad and even worse with a hand totally dominated by their opening/continuing range (which is essentially the same thing here) Please please don't do this! | |
| |
04-17-2011 03:26 PM
#4
| |
04-17-2011 03:33 PM
#5
| |
No a VPIP of 42 is not tight, but a PFR of 9 is very tight and that's what's relevant here since villaion opened from UTG and didn't limp. The 42 shows he plays a lot of hands but the 9 confirms he raises hardly any of them preflop, thus making his range in this specific hand tight. | |
| |
04-17-2011 03:45 PM
#6
| |
04-17-2011 03:57 PM
#7
| |
| |