|
|
Looking back at this, I'm realizing that I'm ignoring the advice I've heard many times -- that bets (or shoves) will only fold out worse hands, but only better hands will call. For some reason I'm not taking this concept to the tables. Arrg. 
 Originally Posted by daviddem
I don't like pre, what are you hoping for raising low SC's on the button vs stations and with a maniac in the blinds?
I'm usually raise limpers w/ SC's on the button, but usually not w/ stations ... which I did here. Ooops.
Originally Posted by daviddem
This is 2NL FFS, no need to get cute with SC's, take all the fat value that is there for the taking off the shelf and get through 2NL with a straight line graph and low variance.
Yeah, I need to remember this. I recently went down to 2NL because I found a bunch of leaks and wanted to get a little crazy -- wanted to try some stuff out w/ little consequence and didn't want to risk $. But I think I'm suffereing from fancy play syndrome a little here. 
Originally Posted by kfaess
Why would you not post your thoughts during the hand and your own analysis? Seems like you're asking someone to give you the answer rather than trying to figure it out on your own.
Huh? 
Originally Posted by connorislost
If BB just flats after your call then you would be calling around 15% of pot to hit your card 25% of the time and a good chance to stack off given opponents. so when u call and hit you will win the same amount if you shoved. If you miss you can easily fold and save you're stack.
Yikes, can you explain this a little? I call 0.12, BB flats 0.12 making the pot 0.89 which ~15% of my 0.12 call. Ok.... but how does hitting make the same amount if shoved? 
|
Reply With Quote