Some hands from last night - 50nl

[grnydrowave2]

who are you on ftp?

My name on FTP is grnydrowave. All these hands were played on Rush tables.

KK - who is villain? what is their fold to c-bet %. Fold turn, 10-5 types don't float as much as you think, nor do they often shove JJ here. You rep the nuts and he's eager to play for stacks.

Villain's name is "when u know". His fold to c-bet is 50%, which might seem very floaty, but this is only over a sample of 2 hands.

How do we feel about the 2nd barrel? I think there might be some value in this, as a lot of his c/c range is overpairs that we beat.

AdQd - flop fold, not even close vs an ubernit. Especially if he's eastern european.

For some reason I was thinking that if his range is 99+, sets, and the occassional KdJd, then I have something in the neighborhood of 45% equity so shoving is +EV if he just folds a small percentage of the time. But you're right, his range is probably way more narrow than that. This hand is kind of embarrassing now that I look at it with fresh eyes, lol.

AdAs. Close. Bet-fold turn if you're planning to check-call. As played don't call turn if you aren't planning to call river.

c/c and then folding the next street is probably a big leak of mine. It's something I've been trying to work on. When contemplating a c/c I should be asking myself how I feel about calling another bet the next street.

That said, isn't the principle behind b/f that most villains are calling more hands than they're betting with? In this case villain seems very aggro, so I think c/c might be the better line against him.

AsAc. Gross. Turn is interesting. River call as played.

Ehhh. Turn is tough. I kind of feel like it's close to 50/50. By that I mean he's doing that with stuff like overpairs half the time and I have him smoked, but just as often he has sets. River is a pretty easy call given the odds, imo. But I think it's weird that he bets that size. Effective stacks are about $34 I think. Are we still calling a shove? I tend to think yes, but that's based entirely on my assessment of his range on the turn, which may be flawed.

Thanks for the input, Daven.