|
|
 Originally Posted by spoonitnow
Additionally, the argument "I shouldn't do ________ because it makes me exploitable" fails logically because by definition exploiting someone makes you exploitable, so an equivalent statement would be "I shouldn't do ________ because it's exploiting someone".
I disagree. Exploiting somebody only makes you exploitable if you always do it.
Can we infer that if the villains range is similar to ours that their betting range is polarised, i.e their hand is neither strong nor weak?
|
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote