11-18-2010 10:49 AM
#1
| |
| |
11-25-2010 05:50 PM
#2
| |
![]()
| |
| |
11-25-2010 06:43 PM
#3
| |
I prefer 66, simply because when it hits, it tends to win larger pots, especially in raised pots. KQ has nasty reverse implied odds, the worst that can happen really with 66 is set under set, which is rare. Bottom line is, I don't mind being out of position with a set. | |
| |
11-25-2010 09:32 PM
#4
| |
![]()
| |
| |
11-30-2010 06:24 AM
#5
| |
![]() ![]()
|
in 6max???? No way I am folding KQ utg in 6max. Probably not in FR either. |
11-30-2010 09:33 AM
#6
| |
Last edited by OngBonga; 11-30-2010 at 09:37 AM. | |
11-30-2010 02:32 PM
#7
| |
![]() ![]()
|
lol, ok, bro, you're right, but I didn't see him say FR either. The folding KQ UTG just caught my eye and that's why I'm "all the way back to page one" and if you are doing it in 6max it's probably wrong. I really cannot think of too many situations at all where you should fold it UTG unless you are playing like a nit. Which isn't necessarily wrong at 5NL, but you could probably be making more by placing it in your range. |
11-30-2010 02:45 PM
#8
| |
To be fair, I'm pretty bad at 6max cash rooms. I do play 6max mtts though, and have a reasonable record, and KQo is certainly in my UTG opening range. As for 9+, in MTTs I might well open KQo, depends on table of course, but at cash rooms FR I am a nit UTG. I'm looking at adding KQs to my opening range UTG, but I think I'll keep folding KQo. | |
| |