Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

These people are our future

Results 1 to 75 of 767

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    When it boils down to it, the reason real taxation on what people "earn" is paramount is because the deservedness "system" is imbalanced, and if we don't artificially push power towards those who don't "deserve" it, we've inadvertently created an oligarchy where the vast majority of people born into the society do so with less rights and opportunity than average
    This point really needs to be hit. I'm not sure how many people realize that in the US, average wealth is substantially higher than median wealth. This is a regressive society where the majority of kids are born into a position below average and a handful of special kids are born into a position above average. A primary purpose of progressive taxation is to tighten the gap so it becomes fair for those who haven't even been born yet.

    Puts a taint on the deservedness idea, doesn't it? When everybody gets to keep too much of what they "earned", future generations suffer
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    This point really needs to be hit. I'm not sure how many people realize that in the US, average wealth is substantially higher than median wealth. This is a regressive society where the majority of kids are born into a position below average and a handful of special kids are born into a position above average. A primary purpose of progressive taxation is to tighten the gap so it becomes fair for those who haven't even been born yet.

    Puts a taint on the deservedness idea, doesn't it? When everybody gets to keep too much of what they "earned", future generations suffer
    Who decides how much is "too much," and why do you think you are entitled to any of the cheese I make with my own two hands? Why do other islanders have a right to go into my hut and take my wine and cheese that I made with my own labor?

    The island would be defined as "regressive" in your view as well, because the prolific worker would skew the average wealth higher than the median wealth, even on a five man island.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Lyric View Post
    Who decides how much is "too much," and why do you think you are entitled to any of the cheese I make with my own two hands? Why do other islanders have a right to go into my hut and take my wine and cheese that I made with my own labor?
    Wait, so the other islanders don't have the right to go into your hut and take your shit but they do have the right to throw you in jail if you commit a crime?

    I don't see why you think it's abhorrent that the state has the right to take your money but cool that the state has the right to permanently take your freedom/life.

    Also your foot-stomping indignation against paying taxes is completely undermined by the fact that you feel a state is necessary to "enforce laws prohibiting murder, theft, and enslavement, maintain courts of law, and maintain a military.". You either want a government or you don't. By all means advocate a small government, but realise that philosophically arguing against taxes just has you whining about your own utopia.
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash256 View Post
    Wait, so the other islanders don't have the right to go into your hut and take your shit but they do have the right to throw you in jail if you commit a crime?

    I don't see why you think it's abhorrent that the state has the right to take your money but cool that the state has the right to permanently take your freedom/life.

    Also your foot-stomping indignation against paying taxes is completely undermined by the fact that you feel a state is necessary to "enforce laws prohibiting murder, theft, and enslavement, maintain courts of law, and maintain a military.". You either want a government or you don't. By all means advocate a small government, but realise that philosophically arguing against taxes just has you whining about your own utopia.
    The government takes in, what, 10 trillion dollars a year? You think they need even 1 percent odd that to provide all these things? The only thing that would get in its way is military but i'd be astounded if anyone in this thread supports big military.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash256 View Post
    Wait, so the other islanders don't have the right to go into your hut and take your shit but they do have the right to throw you in jail if you commit a crime?

    I don't see why you think it's abhorrent that the state has the right to take your money but cool that the state has the right to permanently take your freedom/life.

    Also your foot-stomping indignation against paying taxes is completely undermined by the fact that you feel a state is necessary to "enforce laws prohibiting murder, theft, and enslavement, maintain courts of law, and maintain a military.". You either want a government or you don't. By all means advocate a small government, but realise that philosophically arguing against taxes just has you whining about your own utopia.
    Taxation and a small government are necessary. I am opposed to redistribution of wealth, not taxation or government per se.
    Last edited by Lyric; 09-25-2010 at 08:43 PM.
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash256 View Post
    Wait, so the other islanders don't have the right to go into your hut and take your shit but they do have the right to throw you in jail if you commit a crime?

    I don't see why you think it's abhorrent that the state has the right to take your money but cool that the state has the right to permanently take your freedom/life.

    Also your foot-stomping indignation against paying taxes is completely undermined by the fact that you feel a state is necessary to "enforce laws prohibiting murder, theft, and enslavement, maintain courts of law, and maintain a military.". You either want a government or you don't. By all means advocate a small government, but realise that philosophically arguing against taxes just has you whining about your own utopia.
    I am opposed to all the island people forming an armed gang and forcing the most productive guy on the island to give them half of his stuff. Charity should be voluntary, and a mob of islanders with sharp sticks taking his stuff is the same thing as modern government taking half of Bill Gate's income and giving it to banks and corn farmers and bomb makers.

    It just backfires and we can't see the damage it does because we never see how productive the hard working guy would be without the huge amount of theft at gunpoint (redistribution of wealth).

    The whole point of government is to stop armed mobs, not become the armed mob itself.
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash256 View Post
    I don't see why you think it's abhorrent that the state has the right to take your money but cool that the state has the right to permanently take your freedom/life.
    Both are completely abhorrent, so both should only be used when absolutely necessary. I will allow the state to collect taxes for the purpose of protecting me from the harm of other people. I'm pretty sure there was a time where there were no jails, and the majority of humans decided to get together and say we want to be protected from the harm of others, lets all band together and pay for police and jail to help.
    Check out the new blog!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •