3/6 - dumb hand, small pot gone big

[Carroters]

Can we not b/f more on this river like 30, since we're beating almost his whole range a ton of the time, and since we're trying to get value from PPs worse than 88 (a weak range), shouldn't we bet a size that we'd bluff with and expect him to be way less likely to raise us and just as likely to call?

[griffey24]

Can we not b/f more on this river like 30, since we're beating almost his whole range a ton of the time, and since we're trying to get value from PPs worse than 88 (a weak range),

Yah ofcourse we can bet more. But we're not getting called by PPs worse than 88, because PPs worse than 88 are counterfeited on this board. So we're getting called by A high (Q high?).

The problem with this spot, reg vs reg, is that I know this is such a dumb spot for a reg to bluff. It makes no sense, but I'm not sure what level he's on.

Max - that's an interesting point about the "valuey looking sizes". Thinking about my bluffs now, I can see how that is true. Though I'm not sure about 299. I feel like ppl use 99's to make the chips come out in a huge stack, so it "seems bluffy".. but I'm not sure.