you brought up this crazy person (apparently) to justify your belief that it's good to call a bet getting 10/1 stack odds to set hunt ever. It isn't except in circumstances so extreme that making a rule to include that person is like making a rule for what happens when a bug flies in window and you have to kill it before it stings you. Yes, that will happen eventually, but you'll deal with it then. For now, your time would be better spent making a plan for the 7/8 of the time you don't flop a set or what kind of pot odds you want when you're trying to flop top pair.

Have you ever asked yourself why we don't have a rule for that? Shouldn't be much more complicated - assuming you're willing to make goofy assumptions like we do with sets. The reason is rules were made up by nits who hated to lose. So they made up rules to follow. More important, rules that other people could NOT follow, and then they would have played bad when they stacked the nits. But nits don't like top pair, they like sets. So they went out and found a way to justify playing the pure nuts, do a lot of folding, and complain, which is why they are at the poker table.

I'm not saying this is you, but I absolutely believe that if you break down the math on set hunting compared to raising or folding most of those pairs you will never tell anyone 20/1 again.

The next time you're folding T2o from the SB getting 12/1 even you know pot odds alone would dictate a call, ask yourself why you would use the even less reliable "stack odds" to justify calling a raise in the SB with 22.