If I think villain is a 0 level thinker and lilkely bad, does it matter what I'm repping? The turn is really bad if we think there's any chance we will get c/r off our hand, but I thought this was close to 0.

I didn't think a Q was likely at all on the river because I don't see why he would ever play it this slow up until now on this drawy of a board. If my read is correct, I'd expect him to play a strong hand fast here in a 3 bet pot.

So basically:

1. I think he has a very weak hand with some or no sd value at most AJ and almost never a Q or better. By the way; why do people think a Q is even in his range here?

2. We have K high so even if we aren't repping much against a likely non thinking player, I'd rather follow through than shut down and lose to a weak range.

3. I don't think in this spot that it matters one bit in the slightest how I'd play nut hands here and that I'd never take this line with a set or top 2 or KQ. This $19 stack donk imo looks very weak and isn't going to hero call us because he likely doesn't understand that my line says ""I have either the nuts or a bluff""

Fwiw even if I'm wrong about this guy's ability and he is putting me on a range of hands etc, I think my shove on the river looks far less like a busted fd after I bet the turn. Checking turn and betting the river I think would be "repping the missed fd" more.

Maybe checking behind turn and giving up river is better. I like IOPQ's point that I'll stack him should an ace fall, but I think after betting the turn it makes my shove on the river a bit more credible and I have to follow through at this point.

Thanks for the useful input. Let me know if any of my thinking there is bs sicne it's just my take on things.