Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

10nl TPTK for stacks

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1

    Default 10nl TPTK for stacks

    Villain is 36/10/1.3 over 600+ hands, and is noted as a minor fish - not terrible.

    $0.05/$0.1 No Limit Holdem
    5 players
    Converted at weaktight.com

    Stacks:
    UTG ($3.50)
    CO ($20.75)
    Hero ($11.30)
    SB ($8.15)
    BB ($5.87)

    Pre-flop: ($0.15, 5 players) Hero is BTN
    UTG calls $0.1, CO raises to $0.4, Hero raises to $1.2, 2 folds, UTG folds, CO calls $0.8

    Flop: ($2.65, 2 players)
    CO checks, Hero bets $1.5, CO goes all-in $19.55, Hero ??
  2. #2
    Wow.
    Ive seen a lot of this kind of shit lately.
    Minor fish doesnt give us much to go on.
    Have u seen him pull this before???
    I would lean towards a fold here but its really read dependant.
    Theres no flush or straight draws out there even.
    Im curious to see some replies.
  3. #3
    kq ak aa kj 77?
    me thinks ak kq 77 is most likelys
    perhaps an ace and then another one odd no reraise

    19,800 games 0.031 secs 638,709 games/sec

    Board: Ks 3d 7h
    Dead:

    equity win tie pots won pots tied
    Hand 0: 51.258% 36.02% 15.24% 7131 3018.00 { AhKd }
    Hand 1: 48.742% 33.50% 15.24% 6633 3018.00 { AA, 77, AKs, KQs, AKo, KQo }
    [11:11] <+bikes> bitches love your face
  4. #4
    dev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,624
    Location
    swonging and swonging
    no draws on board, I'm inclined to fold.

    Aside: flop bet sizing?
    Check out my self-deprecation here!
  5. #5

    Default Re: 10nl TPTK for stacks

    Quote Originally Posted by Robb
    noted as a minor fish - not terrible.
    Take better notes and don't berate your opponents in your notes.

    If I've seen him fold to a 3-bet before, I would probably fold. If he commits to flops and the shove isn't too out of line for him, I would call. If he's very passive then I might lay this down.
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by dev
    no draws on board, I'm inclined to fold.

    Aside: flop bet sizing?
    LoL. Flop bet was an "out of time" aim at 2/3's. My 4 year old needed help blowing his nose.

    No draws = inclined to fold?? Why? No draws drastically cuts down on what he could have here that beats us. AA, Kx, 77, 33 are ahead. But preflop AA/KK would probably have 4bet, and 33 is unlikely to have raised. What makes sense here in his raise/flat the 3bet range?

    This is another hand like the "4 noobs, read this hand" post from a couple weeks ago. Nothing in his range that's beats us makes any sense for his betting pattern. That's what "hung me up" on the way to clicking the "fold crap now" button.
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Robb
    Quote Originally Posted by dev
    no draws on board, I'm inclined to fold.

    Aside: flop bet sizing?
    No draws = inclined to fold?? Why? No draws drastically cuts down on what he could have here that beats us.
    I think what he's saying is that opp didn't c/R all in with an 8 or 9 out draw that we'd be ahead of. If there's a million draws out there it'd be easier to hit the call button.
  8. #8
    Muzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,315
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Quote Originally Posted by Robb
    Quote Originally Posted by dev
    no draws on board, I'm inclined to fold.

    Aside: flop bet sizing?
    LoL. Flop bet was an "out of time" aim at 2/3's. My 4 year old needed help blowing his nose.

    No draws = inclined to fold?? Why? No draws drastically cuts down on what he could have here that beats us. AA, Kx, 77, 33 are ahead. But preflop AA/KK would probably have 4bet, and 33 is unlikely to have raised. What makes sense here in his raise/flat the 3bet range?

    This is another hand like the "4 noobs, read this hand" post from a couple weeks ago. Nothing in his range that's beats us makes any sense for his betting pattern. That's what "hung me up" on the way to clicking the "fold crap now" button.
    It's tricky one. On the one hand he's quite passive, but on the other hand its a very small range that we are behind in a 3-bet pot - so leads me to belive this maybe a bluff and the board is so dry. Conflicting evidence :-s

    AA/KK/33/77 are the only hands we should really be worried about and woudl any of those hands want to push here on this very dry flop. It just doesnt make sense at all. Do you know what his raise c-bet% is? Equally do he play mosters fast? I guess this is read dependant
  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Robb
    What makes sense here in his raise/flat the 3bet range?
    Really looks like a badly played KQ/KJ/KT. Ship it.
  10. #10
    frosst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    905
    Location
    count-n mah monies stewie-style
    i think this is more of a "special case" than a general guideline post. what i mean is, don't overthink your opponent's ability. imo, he's not thinking about maximizing value from his nut hand, he's just hoping you're going to stack since you put in a bet. fwiw, ive called a couple of these type of reraises just to see the hand, and its been a nut/near nut hand everytime (2pr >....at least that's the case @ UB 10nl) but if we want to look at utg limping w/ 36%vpip, i fully expect A3/A7 to be in opp range....... why? b/c they're suited lol.....but seriously, i'm expecting this kind of player to open limp any ace, and to not be very positionally aware, which makes his bet more likely to signal a very strong hand. another stat to look at is win pct. if he's winning 55% of the time or greater, and making this kind of raise (when he's normally passive), i'm expecting him to have a good hand.

  11. #11
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,668
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker
    Opp specific
    Some clear fold, some clear call

    That said, no way I'm folding this at 10NL
    He could have AA or KK, standard, send the shipments
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  12. #12
    XTR1000's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,548
    Location
    surfing in a room
    Quote Originally Posted by Robb
    What makes sense here in his raise/flat the 3bet range?
    I expect this to be AA/KK like 80% lately. I haven´t been 4bet by KK+ for weeks now.
    Quote Originally Posted by bigred View Post
    xtr stand for exotic tranny retards
    yo
  13. #13
    frosst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    905
    Location
    count-n mah monies stewie-style
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
    Opp specific
    Some clear fold, some clear call

    That said, no way I'm folding this at 10NL
    He could have AA or KK, standard, send the shipments
    if you're putting him on AA or KK, why do you call? you're beat either way

  14. #14
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,668
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker
    Quote Originally Posted by frosst
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
    Opp specific
    Some clear fold, some clear call

    That said, no way I'm folding this at 10NL
    He could have AA or KK, standard, send the shipments
    if you're putting him on AA or KK, why do you call? you're beat either way
    He may have AA or KK, standard, send the shipments
    FMP


    The amounts of shit I've seen taking this line for stacking off at 10NL will certainly balance the call out

    Sets or overpairs, at this limit, check/minraise 1000% of the time imo
    There is gonna be a minraise involved at some point during the hand if villain's holding is genuinely strong
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  15. #15
    i think you are too far behind his range to call. the board is really dry. people don't normally do this with a single pair, and he isn't drawing.

    post results eventually robb. i'm interested in this one
    Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
  16. #16
    frosst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    905
    Location
    count-n mah monies stewie-style
    i'm curious why we think KK AA are in his range when he raises 10% of his hands.......the only reason to say they are in his range is he was looking to slowplay them preflop and look to reraise, but he didn't do that. He just flat called. He then proceeds to check raise all-in the flop with no draws. If he's somewhat intelligent and is holding AA/KK, why is he check raising instead of check calling like he did preflop. This bet isn't to protect his hand, it's to try to exploit yours. I think the villian is putting you on TPTK/AA, and is hoping you'll stack.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by frosst
    i'm curious why we think KK AA are in his range when he raises 10% of his hands.......the only reason to say they are in his range is he was looking to slowplay them preflop and look to reraise, but he didn't do that. He just flat called. He then proceeds to check raise all-in the flop with no draws. If he's somewhat intelligent and is holding AA/KK, why is he check raising instead of check calling like he did preflop. This bet isn't to protect his hand, it's to try to exploit yours. I think the villian is putting you on TPTK/AA, and is hoping you'll stack.
    calling a pre-flop 3bet oop and c/r all-in any flop is a pretty common line with AA these days. i even saw a p5 article about it a while back. it's def. not out of the question.
    Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by martindcx1e
    post results eventually robb. i'm interested in this one
    http://weaktight.com/138102
  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
    Sets or overpairs, at this limit, check/minraise 1000% of the time imo
    There is gonna be a minraise involved at some point during the hand if villain's holding is genuinely strong
    This is one of the most important observations I've seen in this thread. I don't think is ALWAYS true, but it's definitely one of those "almost always true" statements. I need to keep it mind more.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •