i'm sure you guys are probably sick of me posting hands like this but it's not an uncommon scenario to have to deal with at the micros, and the fact that i want to post this hand tells me that i have some holes in my thinking process as it relates to these spots.

villain here is 26/9 over 40ish. not many of the regs bother with limp/3betting so most of the people we'll encounter do it will be relatively "unknowns". i'm basically interested in forming a plan here. as best i can see it, there are 3 options based on what we think villain's range is and how he plays it. the options are:

A - flat the 3bet and setmine our KK with great implied odds (implication being villain's range = AA exclusively)

B - 4bet/fold (implication being villain is limp/3betting/calling a 4bet with QQ+,AKs or weaker, and only ever 5bets AA)

C - 4bet/call (implication being that villain limp/3bets/5bets a range of QQ+,AKs or weaker (we have 52% vs this range and thus can 4bet/call for value against it)

note: assume here that in option C "4bet/call" means "4bet/call if he shoves" or "4bet/6bet jam if he 5bets" because once he 5bets, the money's pretty much going in. i mean if he's limp/3bet/5bet/folding at 10nl, he's got some real problems.

anyway here's our hand:

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (8 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
BB ($20.79)
UTG ($30.45)
UTG+1 ($52.34)
MP1 ($23.15)
MP2 ($29.65)
CO ($19.87)
Hero (Button) ($25.75)
SB ($25)
Preflop: Hero is Button with K, K
UTG calls $0.10, 4 folds, Hero bets $0.60, 2 folds, UTG raises to $1.60,


i guess what i'd like to hear opinions about are:
- are my plans solid based on their assumptions of villain's ranges/tendencies?
- if my plans are solid based on how we think villain plays his range, which plan are we opting for? ie which do we think is most representative of this villain?
- are there any other options i should consider?

thanks