12-25-2005 04:28 PM
#1
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
| |
12-25-2005 04:52 PM
#2
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Who is villain? |
| |
12-25-2005 04:53 PM
#3
| |
![]() ![]()
|
And to answer question generally, no, AQ is far too good to fold to a late position opener. That's at least my opinion. |
| |
12-25-2005 06:01 PM
#4
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
| |
12-25-2005 06:05 PM
#5
| |
Folding is my 3rd option here. | |
| |
12-25-2005 06:14 PM
#6
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Just because an opponent is tight aggressive doesn't make him incapable of raising with subpar holdings bringing in in late position; if anything, the reverse is true. |
| |
12-25-2005 07:05 PM
#7
| |
| |
| |
12-25-2005 07:11 PM
#8
| |
| |
12-25-2005 08:47 PM
#9
| |
| |
12-25-2005 08:57 PM
#10
| |
| |
12-26-2005 02:03 AM
#11
| |
"It depends." | |
| |
12-26-2005 10:13 AM
#12
| |
Folding here is not a bad play, regardless of what anyone tells you. AQo to a raise OOP can get you into some trouble. | |
12-26-2005 03:58 PM
#13
| |
Too tight. With the fact only three hands dominate you if you hit your flop, it's very bad. Just because he's a typical tag doesn't mean he's always going to raise you with the goods. | |
| |
12-26-2005 09:44 PM
#14
| |
Call, play some poker... | |
12-27-2005 01:02 PM
#15
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
12-28-2005 04:44 PM
#16
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
| |
12-28-2005 10:52 PM
#17
| |
| |