|
spoonitnow
|
09-16-2010, 09:11 PM
Post subject: Bluffing Frequency Quiz
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
You're heads-up in position on the river with a bluff catcher. Your opponent goes all-in with a polarized range of nut hands and bluffs.
Suppose you have 30% equity against his range.
How much equity would you have if he bluffed twice as often as he does now?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Duck Hunter
|
|
Two Pair
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 33
|
|
Back of an envelope calculation, 45%
|
|
|
|
Donachello
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: TROLOLOLOLOL
Posts: 849
|
|
So if we are saying he has a 50/50 polarized range and we have 30% against that range then if he has a 25/75 range (aka twice as much bluffing) .5*x=.3 x = .6*.75 = .45 = 45%
I haz no idea lul
|
|
[00:29] <daven> dc, why not check turn behind
[00:30] <DC> daven
[00:30] <DC> on my hand?
[00:30] <daven> yep
[00:30] <DC> because I am drunk
[00:30] <daven> nice reason
[00:30] <daven> no further questions
[00:30] <yaawn> ^^Lol
Problem officer...?
|
|
Imthenewfish
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: sites im allowed to play on
Posts: 945
|
|
7/10 hands beat us, we beat 3/10. If he bluffs twice as often that's twice as many hands that we beat. now we beat 6/13. 6/13= 46%
|
|
|
|
Sasquach991
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rat Cheer
Posts: 1,012
|
|
Your equity doubles
|
"Just cause I'm from the South don't mean I ain't got no book learnin'"
Quote:
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
...we've all learned long ago how to share the truth without actually having the truth.
|
|
|
Imthenewfish
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: sites im allowed to play on
Posts: 945
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasquach991
Your equity doubles 
|
his value range doesn't change though?
|
|
|
|
Sasquach991
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rat Cheer
Posts: 1,012
|
|
If he was bluffing half the time and now he bluffs twice as much, isn't he now bluffing all the time?
|
"Just cause I'm from the South don't mean I ain't got no book learnin'"
Quote:
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
...we've all learned long ago how to share the truth without actually having the truth.
|
|
|
Donachello
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: TROLOLOLOLOL
Posts: 849
|
|
Opponents # of combos
20
# of bluffs: proportion of bluffs 8:12
Board: 8d 8c 8h Th Td
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 30.769% 30.77% 00.00% 48 0.00 { JJ }
Hand 1: 69.231% 69.23% 00.00% 108 0.00 { QQ+, 64s-63s }
If you add combos to his range that are all bluffs.
# of combos: 28
proportion of bluffs: 16:12
Board: 8c 8d 8h Th Ts
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 47.059% 47.06% 00.00% 96 0.00 { JJ }
Hand 1: 52.941% 52.94% 00.00% 108 0.00 { QQ+, 95s, 73s-72s, 64s }
If you just double the number of bluffing combos in the static 20 combo range.
#: of combos: 20
proportion of bluffs: 16:4
Board: 8c 8d 8h Th Ts
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 72.727% 72.73% 00.00% 96 0.00 { JJ }
Hand 1: 27.273% 27.27% 00.00% 36 0.00 { AA, 97s, 63s-62s, 54s }
So lolz @ 45%, it's close but wrong.
|
|
[00:29] <daven> dc, why not check turn behind
[00:30] <DC> daven
[00:30] <DC> on my hand?
[00:30] <daven> yep
[00:30] <DC> because I am drunk
[00:30] <daven> nice reason
[00:30] <daven> no further questions
[00:30] <yaawn> ^^Lol
Problem officer...?
|
|
Penneywize
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 885
|
|
question is a bit ambiguous, no offense obv
assumptions:
- villain's range is polarized between bluffs and nut hands
- we beat all bluffs but lose to all nut hands
- villain's polarized range is not "balanced" as our equity is only 30%
- therefore 30/100 hands are bluffs and 70/100 hands are nuts
If villain "bluffs twice as often", and he currently bluffs 30/100, then he will now bluff 60/100; and since we beat all bluff hands, our equity is now 60%.
Edit: to clarify - I've interpreted the language used by spoon -- "bluffs twice as often" -- in relative, and not absolute, terms. So the villain is not adding an equal number of bluff combos to the mix; in this case 30+30 / 130 = 46% -- he is actually bluffing double the proportion of combos he was before; 60/100 instead of 30/100.
|
|
|
|
Duck Hunter
|
|
Two Pair
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 33
|
|
Yeah, there's a shit load of assumptions we've gotta make, but
In the first instance, villain is betting 7 nut hands for every 3 bluff hands so our equity is 30% since we win 3 / 10 hands.
If he doubles his bluffing freq, its 7 nut hands for 6 bluff hands - 6 / 13 - so our equity is 46%
|
|
|
|
Penneywize
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 885
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duck Hunter
Yeah, there's a shit load of assumptions we've gotta make, but
In the first instance, villain is betting 7 nut hands for every 3 bluff hands so our equity is 30% since we win 3 / 10 hands.
If he doubles his bluffing freq, its 7 nut hands for 6 bluff hands - 6 / 13 - so our equity is 46%
|
seems to me that if you're doubling your frequency, and your frequency is 30%, you will now make it 60% amirite? 30% to 46% is not doubling your frequency; the way you calculated it is by adding an equal number of combos to the bluff range while maintaining the number of nut hands (not the same thing obv).
Of course I may just be completely misunderstanding the question and, plz can haz forgivness if I r rong?
|
|
|
|
Mr. Bucket
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 109
|
|
Lets say there were ten hand combos in villains range, 3 of which where bluffs. Now he bluffs twice as much. Clearly he will still bet his made hands as well. For this reason, we must change the fraction to 6/13 as suggested by previous posters.
Another way to look at this is say our villain has 20 possible hands with which he can get to the river. In the original scenario he bets 7 of these hands for value, and bluffs with 3 of the other 13 hands. This gives our villain a bluffing % of 3/13 x 100 =23%. In words this means 23 percent of the time he gets to the river with a non nut hand, he fires. if we suggest his bluffing percent doubles he will now be bluffing 46% of his air hands. 46% = 6/13.
Please do not confuse the percent chance villain with bluff with air with our equity. They are not the same.
|
|
|
|
Duck Hunter
|
|
Two Pair
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 33
|
|
When we get to river in the first instance, villain is bluffing 30% of the time, or 30 out of 100.
In the second instance, the number of nut hands he has hasn't gone down, surely?
You're saying he now only has 40 nut hands and 60 bluff hands, I'm saying he still has 70 nut hands (why would he have less nut hands because he bluffs more??) and 60 bluff hands
And we are both sat here waiting for someone better than us at poker to correct us!
Edit: dammit bucket beat me to it!!
|
|
|
|
Duck Hunter
|
|
Two Pair
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 33
|
|
We should bluff rivers more.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Bucket
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 109
|
|
Not if we play 2nl and villains never fold.
|
|
|
|
Duck Hunter
|
|
Two Pair
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 33
|
|
True, obv.
|
|
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penneywize
If villain "bluffs twice as often", and he currently bluffs 30/100, then he will now bluff 60/100; and since we beat all bluff hands, our equity is now 60%.
|
So 30/100 of Villain's value range just magically disappeared?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penneywize
question is a bit ambiguous, no offense obv
|
It's not really, but the average person's understanding of what "twice as often" means gets screwed up when you start talking about percentages, which is part of the point of the thread.
If Bob fucked 6 girls, and Tim fucked 1 girl, then Tim fucked 14.3% of the girls who got fucked by one of them. But what if Tim fucked 2 girls?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
Triple posting because this example is awesome.
I was thinking about the range of girls I've had sex with, and let's say it was five brunette combos, two blonde combos and one redhead combo. Now what if I fucked twice as many blondes?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|
|
HarleyGuy13
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,226
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
It's not really, but the average person's understanding of what "twice as often" means gets screwed up when you start talking about percentages, which is part of the point of the thread.
If Bob fucked 6 girls, and Tim fucked 1 girl, then Tim fucked 14.3% of the girls who got fucked by one of them. But what if Tim fucked 2 girls?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
Triple posting because this example is awesome.
I was thinking about the range of girls I've had sex with, and let's say it was five brunette combos, two blonde combos and one redhead combo. Now what if I fucked twice as many blondes?
|
   Spoon is a natural teacher I'm telling ya!  
|
"You start the game with a full pot o’ luck and an empty pot o’ experience...
The object is to fill the pot of experience before you empty the pot of luck."
Quote:
Originally Posted by XxStacksxX
Do you have testicles? If so, learn to bet like it 
|
|
|
Penneywize
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 885
|
|
So yeah I was going to post moar and make my point etc but seriously, what kind of a douche would I look like if I disagreed with spoon? I've decided instead to post the following picture. I believe this is a wise choice.
|
|
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penneywize
So yeah I was going to post moar and make my point etc but seriously, what kind of a douche would I look like if I disagreed with spoon? I've decided instead to post the following picture. I believe this is a wise choice.
|
There's nothing wrong with disagreeing with me.
Imagine the same question as the OP except you have 60% equity against his range. If he doubles his bluffing frequency, you can't have 120% equity.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|
|
Penneywize
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 885
|
|
Man spoon I am really doing my best here. I would argue with you if I saw a point, but I'd be arguing about language and not so much poker; and hey, this is your thread so I'm auto-wrong anyway aren't I? :P
I could pm you if you really wanted to hear more about this but I doubt it would accomplish much.
|
|
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penneywize
Man spoon I am really doing my best here. I would argue with you if I saw a point, but I'd be arguing about language and not so much poker; and hey, this is your thread so I'm auto-wrong anyway aren't I? :P
I could pm you if you really wanted to hear more about this but I doubt it would accomplish much.
|
You're heads-up in position on the river with a bluff catcher. Your opponent goes all-in with a polarized range of nut hands and bluffs.
Suppose you have 60% equity against his range.
How much equity would you have if he bluffed twice as often as he does now?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|
|
bhaley66
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 150
|
|
^^^= 75% equity (answer in white)
|
|
|
|
parislad
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ~Manchester~
Posts: 75
|
|
Just wanted to type this out as an easy to read post for those for whom it still might not be clear. Please ignore if you're ok with it already obvs.
The way I think of it:
Say villain's range has 7 strong hands which are the virtual nuts, and 3 that are bluffs, and he's shoving all of them. So our equity is 30% (3 hands/10), (because thats how often we win when we call with a medium strength hand).
In an alternative scenario he bluffs twice as often. So he now has 6 hands in his range which are bluffs, but he still has those 7 strong hands. So as we only beat bluffs, our equity is now 46% (6 hands/13).
Nothing more, just helping anyone who finds this sort of thing hard/confusing.
|
|
Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups
|
|
PlayToWin
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 606
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
You're heads-up in position on the river with a bluff catcher. Your opponent goes all-in with a polarized range of nut hands and bluffs.
Suppose you have 60% equity against his range.
How much equity would you have if he bluffed twice as often as he does now?
|
72%
|
|
Explain...what I do for a living without saying "I make monies in da 600 enels by pwnin' tha donk bitches". Instead I say "I'm a online financial redistribution broker". - Sasquach991
|
|
tiltisthename
|
|
High Card
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12
|
|
He bluffs 6 times, value bets 4 times
If he doubles his bluffing frequency, using the figure above he will then be bluffing 12 times and will still be value betting 4 times.
So for a total of 16 hands, 12/16 = 75%.
My first post by the way.
|
|
|
|
Pelion
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,206
|
|
I think this needs clearing up for some people. Polarised does not mean balanced. Polarised means he can have good hands and crap hands, but not medium hands. Polarised does not mean anything to do with frequencies or equities. Polarised does not give us 50% equity.
e.g. AA, KK, AK, QQ, + trash is a polarised range. Whether or not it is balanced is entirely dependent on the number of combinations of trash hands in the range.
Penneywize you should really try to type out an answer to the 60% equity question. I think that will explain things for you.
|
|
gabe: Ive dropped almost 100k in the past 35 days.
bigspenda73: But how much did you win?
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
Penneywize is arguing semantics, no biggie. I'm pretty sure he gets it though, at least I hope so.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|