|
most important part of table selection is recognizing after an orbit that there's NO ONE to get value from at the table. at 50nl 6m, if i have just one player within three seats to my right who is running something retarded (like 50/5, or 45/25 or something like that) who has more than half a stack, and there isn't anyone to my left who is 3b'ing and squeezing an amount that's really pissing me off, then the table's good enough for me.
soooo, like antman said, it's gonna be hard to find a table that DOESN'T meet these criteria at your limit (and i don't even have to switch tables all that often at 50nl).
my main point, though, is that you could simply join every single waiting list there is at your stake and just sit at the first tables that seat you, and if the table isn't juicy then cycle in another one once you're ready to be seated at another table, and this seemingly more random system will do you a lot more good than just looking at stats. i DO look at stats (in fact filter no less than 18bb avg pot and minimum of 30% to the flop) but i join as many waiting lists as i can, and just make sure that i'm never at a table where the biggest fish is like a 25/12 who folds 100% to cbets (obv bad, but not gonna be like printing money).
|