[IMG] Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG]
09-06-2012 08:23 PM
#1
| |
Call or fold?[IMG] Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG] | |
09-06-2012 11:04 PM
#2
| |
I could see his range being something like 55+ AT+ KJs+ which means I think you have to call. Double check the math on that. | |
Last edited by fjuanl; 09-06-2012 at 11:07 PM. | |
09-07-2012 02:36 AM
#3
| |
yeah annoying spot, call off | |
09-07-2012 03:16 AM
#4
| |
Do it. | |
09-07-2012 07:24 AM
#5
| |
TY! Here I really didn´t know what 2 do. | |
09-07-2012 07:52 AM
#6
| |
call 1615 chips ,pot 2500 | |
09-07-2012 08:14 AM
#7
| |
BANNED
|
to be willing to lose a quarter of your chips on a pair of 6's with only investing 360 chips on your raise , i would fold and let him have this hand . |
09-07-2012 11:08 AM
#8
| |
Mathematically, you need to be no worse than about a 2:3 dog to call. But another factor is that chips you win are worth slightly less than chips you lose. So if we give him a range of say 15%, it looks marginal at best. The table chip leader being on my right is another small factor. Overall, I can't seriously fault calling, but favor folding. | |
09-07-2012 01:14 PM
#9
| |
I'm folding. We dominate a tiny % of his range, and are dominated by a reasonable %. We're flipping with the rest. We're prob something like 40% vs his range, idk for sure. | |
| |
09-07-2012 02:26 PM
#10
| |
Need more info. | |
| |
09-07-2012 04:50 PM
#11
| |
It is a pokermaximus event on Merge 5K starting stacks | |
09-07-2012 09:59 PM
#12
| |
It's a call chip EV wise but may not be a call EV wise. | |
| |
09-08-2012 05:38 AM
#13
| |
BANNED
|
cEV we need ~39% (pretty sure we have that here with 66 > ~42%). |
09-11-2012 05:45 PM
#14
| |
Where to begin figuring this out in future situations: | |
| |
09-14-2012 07:56 AM
#15
| |
Thanks for all the info, this is really one of my leaks, I think in ranges but never calculate the % of my hand vs his/her range. | |