The odds of my opponent having the JT of hearts is so slim, I'd put my house in if I could.
I'm a little nervous about the JT of hearts, but not so much that I am likely to lay this hand down.
I really worried about that JT of hearts; I wasn't looking for a SF on this hand, so I will definitely lay this down.
I'm the type of player who plays his gut, so I may or may not lay this down...it all depends on how I feel.
01-11-2005 01:01 PM
#1
| |
| |
01-11-2005 01:10 PM
#2
| |
| |
01-11-2005 01:10 PM
#3
| |
01-11-2005 01:13 PM
#4
| |
Hehe... Didn't see the poll. Agree with Fnord, though. When people are betting houses, you should probably have the nuts. | |
01-11-2005 01:18 PM
#5
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
01-11-2005 01:26 PM
#6
| |
The A | |
| |
01-11-2005 01:31 PM
#7
| |
![]() ![]()
|
I'd bet my firstborn child. |
01-11-2005 03:50 PM
#8
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
01-11-2005 03:58 PM
#9
| |
Guest
|
:Jh: :Th: would be incredibly slim pickens here. I'd say one in 100 hands? |
01-11-2005 05:00 PM
#10
| |
I'm guessing from the fact that you have this poll that the guy actually had 10 J of hearts. However, you have to bet the farm on this hand. | |
01-11-2005 05:53 PM
#11
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
01-11-2005 07:13 PM
#12
| |
I don't think it's a hard laydown if you are not pot commited. he can only do this with 2 cards, A of hearts or T of hearts. so it's not a "no brainer call" | |
| |
01-11-2005 07:16 PM
#13
| |
| |
| |
01-11-2005 10:13 PM
#14
| |
I call with no hesitation. | |
| |
01-11-2005 10:48 PM
#15
| |
| |
| |
01-11-2005 10:54 PM
#16
| |
| |
01-12-2005 09:13 AM
#17
| |
| |
| |